Profile of Klement Pikhtura

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 31

General Information


Thread: ISU-152 HE shell range should be reduced?23 Mar 2020, 11:05 AM The fact that ISU is meta in team games should say something. While it counters AT guns, it counters infantry as well. Same with ele+scope. Just stand near VP watch your flanks and win games. I've seen enough games where units like this single-handedly carried games, not meantioning the diversity of good abilities that doctrines with such assault guns have. Just take a look at KV-2. The docs which have it are pretty one sided and lack diverse measures. But for some reasons docs with Ele and ISU are op af. I think either docs, or unit themselves need to be nerfed, or reworked. ISU doctrines needs to let go of bombing strike, maybe AOE tweaked a bit to decrease wiping potential and remove a possibility of scope upgrade on elephant. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bren and Vickers K not firing on the move for elite infantry22 Mar 2020, 13:06 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2020, 10:48 AMStormjäger Fully loaded Vickers K gun with full ammo is about 14.5 kg. No way in hell you’re firing that thing while running with any accuracy without training on it for months. Some stats: 1919 .30cal is 14Kg and MG34 is 12Kg. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.319 Mar 2020, 20:17 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 21:13 PMKatitof Everyone has to use infantry based AT and ATGs to counter TDs you know. No vehicle in game can just brute force their way frontally, so if you're really keen on using vehicles to counter vehicles that are meant to hardcounter vehicles, you better pull off a good flank. Also, panzergrens move much faster near vehicles, so they can easily support whatever flank or attack you're making with vehicle. Well mentioned JP4 can actually fight TDs. It has range, it has camo and it can move while in camo. My point is that OST lacks reliable TD counter and shrek pgrens does not look like a reliable solution, they actually look like an exact opposite of it. Maybe its just me, but I wish StugG had higher cost on top of being better. Perhaps even having 5 more range, which is still 5 less then TDs. Maybe even gaining that range with vet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Please Fix Guard Motor Coordination and Counterattack in 2v219 Mar 2020, 19:54 PM 120mm is pretty mediocre. It can be decent in team games against mortars, leFHs or pak43s. I guess you can also drop flares further, providing you could vet it up (which I find kind of difficult), otherwise it looks good on paper, but in practice it is very situational and extremely reliant on RNG. Somebody even asked Luvnest about 120mm on one of his streams. He said he did not like it and preferred regular mortar. People need to use it before saying it is strong. t34-85 should be good, it is a doctrinal tank, although as a medium I prefer OST p4 with panzer tactician. Smoke + bliz in terms of survivability is better then flat 160 hp increase imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panthers and Stugs18 Mar 2020, 17:12 PM Default medium and TDs are 640 - 4 shots. Premium USF mediums are 720 - 4 shots T34-85 with 800Hp - 4 shots. LV - 2 shots. I think giving it higher pen is a better idea. Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 08:07 AMNaOCl t-34/85 has a fair shot of 1v1ing a panther, if the panther even misses once, which is always does, even stationary. nice troll In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.316 Mar 2020, 20:53 PM Can someone tell me why Stug has to have lower range then any other TD except Panther? Even Jpanzer have same 60 range as other TDs, but not Stug, that clearly lacks JP's armor. I know it has better ROF and lower cost, but still any other TD outranges it, while lacking camo ability, that JP receives with vet. It brings weird dynamic to Ost, that has to rely on paks to counter TDs, or Panther/P4 rushes (which is often a very high risk endeavor). Paks may work vs brits, or even USF, (to some extend) but Soviets easily counter it with a Katyusha salvo. Not mentioning, that AT gun is quite easy to de-crew and subsequently destroy especially while trying to hunt something that has its own range values. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: wishlist Last few minor changes before live patch15 Mar 2020, 00:11 AM Mark target is indirect counter to Heavy TD. Heavy TDs should counter ISU. ISU is cancer. But I'd be content if every long range heavy got 5 range nerf, including Elephant and Jagtiger. They are extremely boring both to play with and against. Shocks are too good. Lategame PPSh con upgrade is a buff, 'Tank Hunter' is a buff (gets 2 abilities merged + 1 bonus thematic ability), 'Advanced Warfare Tactics' is a buff (imo). Airborne package - just pure consistency. 60 munies gives 3 PPSh to cons and thus should give 3 to penals. Also I think having 1 CP shocks is kind of ridiculous. I know, penals are not cheap, but still. I'm not insisting on any of those changes. Just few ideas that I think are worth sharing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: wishlist Last few minor changes before live patch14 Mar 2020, 23:36 PM Reduce 'Armored Vehicle Detection' ability price to 45 (60 is way too much). Light PMD AT mines becomes a part of the PTRS package ability of 'Tank Hunters' doctrine. Tank hunters get 'Armored Vehicle Detection' ability instead. PPSh conscript package give conscripts 0.05 RA reduction. Alternatively gives PPSh conscripts 'sergeant upgrade' for 30 Munies: gives 1 Conscript model PPSh SMG and reduces RA by 0.05, takes 1 weapon slot. Available if 'Mechinized Armor Kampaneya' is built. Airborne weapon drop for penals give 3 PPShs SMGs inline with the PPSh Conscript upgrade. Increase Shocktroops price by 10 and increase reinforcement cost by 2. Increase ISU ammo change duration by 2 seconds. 'Advanced Warfare Tactics' doctrine gets DShK call-in instead of 'conscript repair kit'. Remove 'mark target' from 'Mechanized Support' give 'Conscript Repair Kit' instead. Elephant can no longer be upgraded with a scope. (maybe) reduce ISU HE range by 5. (plz dont permaban me ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.311 Mar 2020, 17:14 PM Jaeger Armor - counters armor/TD spam, recon+bombing strike counters arty. I think it is too much. Mechanized Support - counters infantry from long range and, to some extend, armor. ISU should be countered by Pak-43 (countered by bombing strike) and Heavy TDs ("mark target" can be used with great effect against it). In my opinion something has to go, for example both bombing strikes in those doctrines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 Ram11 Mar 2020, 14:00 PM I think removing ram from 34/85 and giving it some other ability is a good change. Ability like increasing its moving accuracy by 30%, available at vet 1 costs 30mu. It still won't be on par with what Shermans have, but will emphasize t34/85's offensive role. In: Lobby