Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: StuG III G3 Feb 2020, 06:45 AM Stug is 'fine' in 2v2. Mostly crap in bigger modes. It is supposed to counter med tanks, but big modes, a bunch of stug will get overwhelmed by bunch of t34 or shermans. It is the twp that is clearly shite and unfair. Pretty crappy ability for a vet level. Hence the feelings allies scale better or having sweet bonus outside their buffed states Change that, and its fair. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf3 Feb 2020, 06:12 AM Some ask me what's diff between jackson and ff, after we removed jackson rof pen vet? Ff starts much earlier with 240 tulips/snare and also tank commander sight. Ff punch harder and more accurate. Vetted Ff close in on rof and turret tracking. Jackson still keeps its mobility and survivability. Ff can be supported by comet or Churchill Both with vetted Ap ammo still deals hurt to call in heavy. Vet bonus on Ap ammo still applies P4 vetted has slight chance to bounce at max range P5 vetted armor can scale fairly So if we are ok with current Ff, then my suggestion to Jackson seems fair and brings both 60Td closer No power creep also! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS cover bonus and Pyro2 Feb 2020, 14:06 PM But once bolster comes in, IS is pretty good value no? In past without medics, there is opportunity cost to pay for great sight. With the buff, i think sight needs tone down. The unvet 222 has lesser sight no? I mean if you put sight on UC or AEC, ok. But stock infantry, that's a bit of a tough one.. Its like suddenly lmg gren gains IRpf critical first shot on vet1. In: Lobby
Thread: jackson armor nerf2 Feb 2020, 14:03 PM Ok maybe not spotting scopes stat. How about just +5 sight. Also remove the suggested hvap cooldown buff. Jackson base stats are understandably good but dealable. It's the vet bonus need toning down. Basically this suggestion sorta revert Jackson closer to its original design. And also axis counterplays In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:40 AM Does this nerf affect hetzer, flameht, flamethrower or incendiary nades? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:38 AM I dont use mht much But when i do, i remember the flame barrage is not that accurate. You can target an emplacement,and it may land just around it and do little damage In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:48 AM I think we should try 10% first. For wehr, there is no leig gun. And in 2v2, it is expensive to go for flame ht. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:38 AMSupport Sapper It take about 2 year for the mod team to finally trying to fix UKF. You dont know about the endless neft series UKF has been through from the release up to very currently. Cause again, you dont play UKF. Ukf was fine outside their initial OP intro, when bofors shred anything in sight. In past 2 years, firefly is buffed. We had brens blobs in 2v2, team games. Churchill pretty much dominate 2v2. Piats have been made really good. I dont see this winter trial as fixing ukf. More reactionary to wc19. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:34 AMSupport Sapper Emplacements OP only vs noobs. Emplacement is op in 2v2 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 09:34 AM Straight out removal of the 25% screams over reacting and pandering to wc19 complaints for ukf. What's wrong with a decrease to 10%? Now that pyro sections will get used much more, durable mortar pits and auto barrage... I hate to be conspiracy-ist, but the lightning reactions to allies feels like mod team is leaning more than fair. In: COH2 Gameplay