Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF1 Feb 2020, 11:44 AM Yeah the sight bonus sounds really unfair now it is discussed. Didn't they just nerfed spotting scope. And that's doctrinal Staying in cover, any cover. Is way easier than stationary and a second delay. Seems like a cheese buff to firefly indirectly, and even the ukf pak and emplacements. Mortar barrages in maps like studsdt is going to be so easy. Pyro section holding ground with 52 sight. Lol In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF1 Feb 2020, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Feb 2020, 09:01 AMVipper UKF are about to become better vs MG with smoke and about to need less medic upgrades with medics from base. Pyro proliferation is a valid concern. That is why my suggestion revolves around making pyro not a brainless upgrade but a trade off. IR Pathefinders are at least doctrinal. Thanks for the analysis for us that don't play ukf. Yes hearing so, pyro sight is going to wreck my wehr games even more. The current usf major arty is already a cheese ball. Cant believe how hard mod team is trying to irrelevant wehr static meta. In: Lobby
Thread: StuG III G1 Feb 2020, 09:34 AM It is rather shit outside of countering Churchills. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf1 Feb 2020, 08:58 AM Well recapped vipper! Seems we like have a jackson fan in the mod team. You forgot the last +5 fuel since it is over performing. Idk, but in 2v2, do we all agree a vetted jackson is way better than a vetted panther? Now consider the cost of a Jackson and a panther+pio. Things shouldn't be the case from a game design pov I Will consider remove its rof and pen buff at vet. Replace perhaps with vet crew repairs and +5 sight at stationary. To emphasis its design of mobility. No stock unit should always pen at max range. And no reason a 60td has almost same rof as panther. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Need more visual/audio cues when tanks get hit1 Feb 2020, 04:30 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Feb 2020, 00:37 AMDerKuhlmann I´m thinking he means when you have a vehicle and your focusing another side of the map, there is no audio for it being attack, only when it dies. Yes sort of. As this coh2 TTK have gone up. Reaction times are harder and needs more help cues. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF pop cap problem1 Feb 2020, 04:28 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2020, 20:56 PMMazianni Vehicle crews were a bad idea in the first place tbh. It is good idea. We should reward trying new ideas. It is just that Usf got buffed and changed and buffed. While axis get nerfed and changed and nerfed. Vehicle crew became a problem as it added to Usf cost effectiveness In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Patch for OST?30 Jan 2020, 05:33 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2020, 03:39 AMdistrofio BUFF PANTHERS AND MG42! LET THE FORUMS BURN IN PURE HATE! BUAHAHAHHA Sounds good. Panther moving accuracy to 0.6 at vet1 (per blitz theme) Panther damage to 180 at vet2 (combine arms with shrek against late game superior allies armour vs pen) Mg42 Tear down time reduce by 15% at vet2.(mid-late game when allies infantry pulls away) Wehr simply too cost ineffective and scale worst In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzerfüssilier snare range 29 Jan 2020, 10:12 AM If any snares to look at, its grens! Since it's already lock behind tech. But the critical problem is the faust needs line sight, you may end up missing or have too long load times. I guess a reason why t70 can dominate as much In: COH2 Balance
Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion29 Jan 2020, 10:05 AM Zis does 80hp damage per barrage, pretty potent and again cost effective in allies favour In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion29 Jan 2020, 08:37 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2020, 07:16 AMzerocoh ZiS barrage is just too cheap IMO, 35 muni is the same for a single nade, while the Zis fires 3 "grenades" at 60 range. Make it 45-50 munis and it will fine. Spot on. 60 range is just icing on the cake. In: COH2 Gameplay