Profile of Nosliw

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 515

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/nosliwreborn


Thread: USF didn't need a mortar.15 Jul 2016, 14:47 PM I'm just saying, CoH2 players are bad and not willing to learn how to flank or buy grenades. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF didn't need a mortar.15 Jul 2016, 14:17 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2016, 13:51 PMNEVEC USF needed mortar, pack howitzer can't counter early mg spam. How did CoH1 players ever manage to deal with MGs without using a mortar? Oh wait, it's called being a good player and learning how to flank lel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer needs these beauties13 Jul 2016, 03:21 AM Why are you guys not open to the idea? I think more units is good. Means more doctrines, and more options. Think about this: Soviets already have a medium tank (T34/76) and a doctrine to upgrade them (T34/85), and then IS2, ISU152, KV2 (heavies), KV1/KV8 ("heavies" but not as good) and lend lease Shermans... No one ever complains about all this variety. Ostheer variety in comparison seems so meh: Tiger, Elefant, Puma, Stug E, Tiger Ace... Doctrine with a StuH would be awesome I think. Just because the Brummbär exists doesn't mean you can't have a doctrine specific unit that fills a similar role. Many people make lend lease Shermans (which is an average, general purpose tank, just like the T34) so they can forego going T4. If Ostheer could forego going T4 and get a similar unit via doctrine, just like soviets do with shermans replacing T34s, I think it'd be swell. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: t-34/859 Jul 2016, 21:32 PM If I had to guess, I'd say in team games Russian players support the medium tanks of USF or British players with SU85s or save up for ISU152. Cromwells and Comets are so good, and so is the SU85. In 1v1 I'd say most people just pick different docs. From what I've seen the Sherman doc is really popular since you get a medium tank without teching T4, and huge fuel income from drops to spam shermans. Also, you're not alone. I know that VonAsten for sure goes T34/85s against OKW every game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to win vs double mortar as OKw 24 Jun 2016, 20:18 PM The other thing I find I hate is I'm seeing a lot of OKW players make 4-5 Volks with MP44s. Once they get vetted they are so strong and hard to deal with. And of course since they're Volks they are really cheap to reinforce. Not sure what to do In: Replays
Thread: How to win vs double mortar as OKw 24 Jun 2016, 17:20 PM This playstyle from Overlord is pretty lame tbh - Just blobbing with Zook'd riflemen. No better than the pre-patch Volk blobbing In: Replays
Thread: OKW can be killed in less than 5 minutes22 Jun 2016, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 20:40 PMStug life are you defening the current bugged mortar usf wiht 1.6 osther fire rate and 106 range same as 120 ml all for 260 mp and tier 0 ? No the mortar is definitely bugged and needs to be patched to fix, but saying that USF having a mortar is game breaking is not something justifiable. That's something that needs to be playtested a LOT before anyone can make a conclusion. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some maps STILL have deep snow22 Jun 2016, 20:32 PM Blizzards were removed due to popular opinion. That is a fact. You cannot argue that. Saying that "you can't imagine the majority would dislike blizzards" is therefore simply incorrect. Furthermore, if it weren't for the "cancerous competitive players", the game would still be in an unbalanced state. The game would likely still have useless MGs and super powerful infantry from USF and OKW. People would be blobbing infantry through Blizzards and using B4s precision strike to win games. You have the cancer of the community to thank for increasing the balance of the game so that you "common" players have less to cry about at night. You're welcome. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some maps STILL have deep snow22 Jun 2016, 20:23 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 20:21 PMEtherealDragon Deep snow was removed from certain maps because it was cancer (snow outside your base on left spawn Kod. Ferma was annoying as shit, Semois. had terrible retreat paths that was overly punishing, etc.) Blizzards were a fun idea that offered some novel tactics but the problem was players rarely if ever utilized them - at most you would have cold-immune Volks capping unhindered or maybe bombing a campfire which is several times less strategic than actively moving units around unimpeded and capitalizing on momentum and pushing an advantage. Also the "most people" argument is stupid - any game developer is going to make a product that appeals to the majority of its playerbase - unless you really want COH2 to become a dead game, in which case sure, let's keep all the annoying mechanics that people don't like just because a minority like theorycrafting on how "no, blizzards could be totally cool, really!" +1 Summed up exactly how I feel on the topic. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some maps STILL have deep snow22 Jun 2016, 20:19 PM I can tell from the way you present your thoughts on this forum that you surely were on a debate team in high school or University. In: COH2 Gameplay