Profile of RollingStone

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 173

General Information
Steam: 76561198360436908


Thread: Do Allies retreating units get smaller target size?28 Jun 2019, 16:54 PM So, a retreating squad of obers walks into a BAR... You do know, how BAR damage dispertion works? If don't, then it looks like this - If it hits, some of damage is transfered to other models. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New USF doctrine is too good26 Jun 2019, 19:15 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 12:58 PMKatitof So, I was right after all, you were not aware of them. Next time, pls, clarify that you meant two of 12 infantry units of OKW that have Blenderkopfer nades. Because "infantry" have quite large meaning. Noone actually uses them, AFAIK - mostly because they are locked behind 2 most expensice squads in whole army composition. Same stuff that now assault tommies have. However, tommies are mainlane infantry, not some elite of arian race, and that might lead to some problems. And, same ability also located in UKF - AFAIK, Comet can shoot WP shells at vet1. Again, almost noone really uses it, at least i've never seen that one, and again, because it is locked to one of most expencive unit in whole army. And now, the main, universal and rather cheapish USF tank have those shells. Same sutiation as with ass.tommies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New USF doctrine is too good26 Jun 2019, 12:35 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 12:21 PMKatitof You are aware of WP nades on OKW infantry, are you? And they are STOCK. Will you now start complaining about that too, or is it exclusively allies issue again? Those nades are not exactly like WP shells, they are sharing denial-role with molotovs, with bit more of damage on impact. WP can block LoS, slow down models inside and keeps burning until healed, therefore more capable in attack. Yet, area of effect is quite small, while cost is simular to OKW lava-nade, so it seems fine for me. Yeah, sorry for faultfinding. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 15 min ele/jagdtiger25 Jun 2019, 04:30 AM just give kubel heavvy crush, blitz and tie it to t4. Just imagine it - hoardes of kubels roaming around, crushing tons of cons, breaking tru bushes, iron fences and alike... This is perfection In: Lobby
Thread: Hotchkiss22 Jun 2019, 05:01 AM Better it be 10 min hotchkiss than 10 min tiger, so where do i sign? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Requesting that the Ost 251 Forward Retreat Point stay.19 Jun 2019, 18:51 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2019, 18:33 PMpvtgooner Imagine looking at this recent patch as an OST player with all the buffs and still saying theyre UP because of a hotfix to a unit that should have never had that ability to begin with. Because it was actually fresh and unexpected change? No videos from Hans/tightrope/greyshot's brothers, no discusions on forums, no battles in balance section about upcoming changes? Yes, this patch was good for all nations, stirring up that old and stale meta with some spices and major overhaul of OST is feeling really good, more shrek blobs and 10min tiger rushes, but that FRP was something we all were waiting form. However, FRP trows assimetrical balance straight outta window. . On one hand we have really good buff to OST, on other - their identity as army, those Doom'sday PaKs, panzer blitzes and grenadiers sitting in trenches and waiting for enemy to walk strait into those defences. You need to break tru it, and then it will crumble. With FRP, however, german infantry can come back much, much faster, pushing you back. I have mixed feelings now, as i think about it. It does not really suit well for my usual Ostheer gameplay. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Requesting that the Ost 251 Forward Retreat Point stay.19 Jun 2019, 17:05 PM They just removed it. Good night sweet prince, never forgetti. https://community.companyofheroes.com/discussion/67/coh-2-changelog/p6 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T47 Jun 2019, 20:00 PM T-34/76 is mostly situational, IMO. If fuel supply is scarse, then save for TD's or call-ins. But they should stay in T4, and thats why. They kinda cheapish; they can cap, therefore no serious infantry support needed; their hull MG literally melts every infantry unit; they can ram other tanks, stunning them for long enough to call in IL-2 strike, or get in couple shots from AT-gun, another t-34 or, my preferred strat - ISU-152, almost 100% killing or badly damaging enemy armor. Main thing in using T-34/76 is to get at least 2 of those and do not just send them straight in front ofPaK-wall and P4 cannons. For sure this wont work in 1v1 "elite" battles, because of totaly different meta from all others regimes, but I don't really care about it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April fools mod?3 Jun 2019, 08:55 AM I hope you do understand, that nothing of that were really implemented into game and whole post is made for lulz? In: Modding and Tools
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage20 May 2019, 15:36 PM Russian KV-series are fine(totaly not biased because of nationality ) Churchills are, on the other hand, OP. While KV have higher armor, Churchill have 600 hp more(800 vs 1400 if believe to coh2db) and better gun in terms of AOE and pen, thus more prone to kiting your forces and not just throwing itself into any holes of your defences. And let's not forget the glorious vet1 "self-defence" bren's all over the hull. And let's not forget Firefly-Churchill combo, that inflames my butt every time I see that sweet couple toughter. Both heavvy flamers are absolute cancer and not fun to play against them. However, if kv-8 is rare sight, Crocodile is in meta. In: COH2 Balance