Profile of Rosbone

I am not pitching a revolutionary idea or scheme, but the only way for survival for our beloved game.

A-move on Tank Destroyers makes sense and works quite well from my experience. Are you guys attack moving your mediums or something? Because that would seem really odd to me and I dont understand why you would want to do that

When I A-move a tank, it drives about 45 meters past where it should stop and shoot. Then it blows up. Same with any vehicle. Cant kite a Kubel. It either cant "see" the enemy or does the same thing tanks do where it drives right up to the enemy before shooting. The server code is complete garbage.

Without wanting to comment on the conclusion:
You've stated some wrong data. You're looking at all the games, not only at the top 200. The top 200 data back until October includes a whopping 4 games with all Soviet teams, as well as obviously way less games than the ones in your screenshot.

Thanks Hannibal. I always use the MAP STATS header which has NO OPTION for number of players

I see the STATS header does. I will have to review all of the data now. Or not, since no one cares or reads it. They just blurt some random vitriol and dip out

Seeing only 4 games as all SOVs further illustrates my point that you only see heavy SOV loaded games at level 12 and down. It also shows that the level 12 and down players have the chances to win that I posted since the stats are ALL games.

EDIT:
Seeing this top200 players only map stat made me throw up in my mouth a little.

Also these stats dont support your claim that soviets are weak. Soviets are simply played by tons of new players only owning the base game.
They also play OST ofcourse, but OST linear teching and more generalist units means its harder to fuck up.

New players = bad players = higher loss streaks.

I think you are stuck in a loop or dont remember the start of this discussion.

Let me summarize for new readers:





Graphs show:
1) Top 200 player matches show that axis win about 3% more than allies in 4v4.
2) Soviets are the worst performing army.
3) All soviets against Okw, Okw, Ost, Ost only has a 35% chance to win.
4) 3 soviets and a USF against Okw, Okw, Ost, Ost only has a 37% chance to win.
5) 3 soviets and a brit against Okw, Okw, Ost, Ost only has a 39% chance to win.

Anecdote data (not facts):
1) I personally see SOV struggle in games.
2) I have seen more matches at Level 12 down that have 3 or 4 soviets than at higher levels. These are less likely to be wins.

My Conclusion:
- Soviets are weak in 4v4.
- More soviets = lose.
- Lower ELO sees more soviet matchups and lose more.

Therefore, Soviet players at Level12 and lower are more likely to get stuck in ELO hell and have long losing streaks.

Feel free to interpret the data anyway you see fit. I am not "bitching". I am using science and data to see if a problem exists for the benefit of players. Something Relic is not doing. But keep licking Relics balls and see how far you get with that.

Another fun thing to do is go to SPECTATE and see the team makeup of the top page of 4v4 matches. You will see that soviets number 1-2 on a team until you get to level 11 games where it becomes 3-4 soviets. This is the entrance to ELO Hell. From level 11 (80% of players) down you have a stronger chance of losing several games in a row.