Profile of Rosbone

Start since 1:03:05
Against 2 OKW in rails and Metal

I suck at 2v2, am a noob, and I am not a strategist. You should also post a replay instead of a video. And that map position is probably bad for USF.

1. Your panic bunker put you behind. I do it too. Best to not put it up unless you OWN the ground and have support. Or you are basically losing a squad. I do not think I have ever seen a pro make a bunker?
2. Your Brit partner was doing well but you did not support him when he got pushed. You could have moved more to his side and pushed together. Which you did when your Stuart came out. 2v2 seems to be all about the 2v1 situations.
3. I do not know 2v2 meta but most 1v1 players make an M20/AAHT and put bars on the riflemen. Then move to Sherman or Jackson. I do not see many high level players making Stuarts because you nerf your AI capability too hard and use too much fuel? Place mines as much as you can.
4. You may be soft retreating to soon in engagements? Maybe hold your ground to increase DPS then full retreat.
5. You could use a commander with some better CQC units. Rangers perhaps since you were getting pushed by sturms early. A Strategist would help here. Are the paratroppers OP now because you can put two MGs on them? Bueller? Anyone?


Just trying to help. Since this is not an upload in the strategy section, you may not get any REAL help. Your micro seemed to be good from what I watched. If you can catch TroyD's twitch stream. He is a genius. Also watch ClassyDave play USF. His USF play is famous.

The nerf may have killed it. It seems to happen every patch. It will be fixed next patch.

But at least the brits have 37 other OP AS HELL tanks to choose from. In team games just build the centaur early game. Late game, build the Churchill infantry tank (damage sponge) and spearhead right into the enemies as your team follows behind with TDs. Or even use the CIT with a Firefly. Of course everything sounds good on paper

In fact, that's the one thing that doesn't make sense about HMG squads: they all suppress in the same amount of time, but some get to deal heavy damage to the point of being hardcore garrison counters, while others barely deal damage to units on the ground and out of cover.

I think Katitof was trying to say:


But I don't read patch notes much, so I would have believed you. But the question was how would the game be with less suppression and way more damage (DPS)? Would there be less blobbing if they were getting chopped up instead of suppressed?

No.

Zuba Yes.

Yeah and they also made them so powerful that there is litteraly no reason to go for and m10 since they are actually more cost effective. Its ubsurd.

Will a Jackson squish squads like an M10 I like it when they go Squiiiiiisssh.