Profile of ullumulu

Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2018, 14:06 PMKatitof

2 P4s have similar cost and far greater firepower.
Panther+P4 does what KT does, but better and if you repair one, other can be in action, so you always have armor presence.

And KT isn't supposed to wipe anything, if you missed the memo for last 2 years, not even nuke "shoot once a minute" weapons aren't supposed to wipe reliably unless you score pinpoint accurate hit.

It could be more reliable vs inf together with IS-2, but neither is supposed to be wiping anything. Brummbar but with AT capabilities is not needed.

Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2018, 09:13 AMKatitof

1) Learn to edit your posts
2) 720mp, 260f. Teching isn't exclusive side tech that unlocks exclusively one unit and is a matter of timing the unit, not the cost. Lack of caches is irrelevant, just scavenge wrecks. Don't complain that faction that is supposed to struggle for fuel struggles for fuel.

And you nearly never see it in tournaments, because there is no point to it there, it isn't how tournament level players work, hell Tiger isn't being used in tournaments and its in strongest state it ever was.

You know why is that? Because in tournaments all resources your banking and saving for later are not on the field, doing the work and contrary to your sub 500-700 rank automatch game, on tournament level you need to put constant pressure and you can't do that with 13+cp end tech units (unless its brummbar durrrr hurrrr), because if you don't, opponent will and will push you off the map, as we can clearly see in literally any 1v1 tournament.

Now, VonIvan got it to vet5 couple of weeks ago and KT clearly carried that 2v2 game.

Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2018, 08:54 AMKatitof

But I have a clue about balance in PC games.
And a gun that does 50% more damage then most other while having similar reload wouldn't be balanced if it was allowed fast tracking as well.

Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2018, 03:41 AMShadowLinkX37

15-20 range is normal for snares. Not 0

Tested KT

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/344835886

Test #1: All units stationary, range 50

Test #2: Squads moving, KT stationary, range 50

Test #3: KT moving, squads stationary, range 50

Test #4: KT and squads moving, KT avoiding snare

Test #5: KT engine crit speed comparison with moving squad, Jackson attacking.

Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2018, 10:55 AMLago

The idea of it was it'd drive forwards into enemy lines and infantry would run up the smoke to avoid HMGs. Nobody uses it like that, but that's why it's there.

You could give the KT smoke, and it would make it slightly more survivable. But that's not the buff it needs. It needs to be impactful rather than being even more of an unreliable veterancy farm for enemy TDs.



jagdpanzer says 'why won't you love me'

That thing costs and functions the same as an SU-85. If it doesn't have similar penetration already, it probably should.