Profile of Luciano

Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2018, 19:31 PMCultist_kun

While few ppl use it, now noone will use it, so whats the point of keeping it?

Agreed that its OP, but overall commanders with it are unpopular anyway, so better to just replace it completly.

Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2018, 19:40 PMShadowLinkX37

We do indeed, for example I think the G43, su76, and Tiger Ace are broken. Nerfs? only on the 76 and not on its cost or XP requirements. Meanwhile Su85 is getting a sight nerf for some reason. When was the last time someone opened a thread saying Su85 self sight was busted more than TA or the su76?

Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2018, 08:21 AMcapiqua

not implemented:

missing in changuelog:

Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2018, 17:03 PMJade Buddha

Is there a reason the soviet sniper cant have uniquely high received accuracy out of all the snipers?

Do you see my point? The stated aim is change X to achieve Y. But in reality X is achieving Y and Z (easier to kill with infantry and homogenised sniper interaction).

If it is a conscious decision that all snipers should behave essentially the same when interacting with each other, then this isn't justified/explained by saying that infantry flanks on snipers aren't rewarding enough at the moment.

What is the thought process behind that? Is it worth homogenisation to change that sniper interaction and strip the unit of its uniqueness?

If the argument is that everyone should have access to countersnipes as a counter to snipers, how is that balanced with OKW and USF not having access to snipers at all? Making infantry flanks rewarding against snipers (it is only not rewarding against the Soviet sniper at the moment) fixes the issue for all factions and retains the uniqueness of the unit.

This isnt JUST a balance change, but a fairly significant design and flavour change as well.