Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Mainline infantry sandbags change19 Feb 2020, 10:01 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 03:19 AMLatch UKF are already gimped by being unable to wire off until tech up, removing sandbags from them would render maps that have no cover especially on important areas an immediate veto for a faction that revolves around cover. You want to solve this "issue", make it unable to have green cover created inside capture areas, instead being able to upgrade the capure area with defences for a cost, that way, you lose it, you give dences to the enemy. One will simply have to test and see but the majority of map provide all type of covers. Point here is that IS currently should be balanced around fight in green cover and full health and that is part of the reason they are difficult to get in the right spot. One can more the sandbags to Ro.E. and make any adjustments needed to IS. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Feedback for winter preview19 Feb 2020, 09:34 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 03:17 AMSuperHansFan Compare Churchill armor with KT or JT and you will see why FF has extra pen. I don't think you can crawl out of this one when in old Churchill threads you were calling for nerfs to "non doc heavies" like Churchill. You have been drinking the imperial dane coolaid if you think JP doesn't counter churchill, AVRE or croc as well as FF counters KT. Jagdpanzer actually kills a Churchill faster, go test it. I am not sure why you want to personalty attack me (once more) but at least get your facts straight. What I have said about Churchill is that in need its rear armor lower to be inline with other heavy units. (and many other user agree with me) You should also check the cost difference ration between a JP vs Churchill and FF vs a KT and the fact that FF has access to Tulips that an almost guaranteed damage+snare vs KT so your argument holds no water. The majority of user will tell you that Panther is designed to take on super heavies and JP is designed to take on mediums. Can it take a Churchill yes it can but so can Stug for far less pop. Point here is that FF does need a pop reduction and JP need one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mainline infantry sandbags change18 Feb 2020, 23:55 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 20:30 PMDoomlord52 .... I agree with this, but the only problem is UKF. Their engineer-type unit is locked behind tech, so they wouldn't get SBs early on. And there is little reason for IS to be able to built heavy cover in first place. Part of the reason why IS are hard to balance is that every engagement vs IS was in a crucial area of the map vs heavy after which IS could simply heal up again. Without sandbags available to them they would have to use the cover available in the map as other mainline infatry. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Assault Guards M5 HT18 Feb 2020, 23:46 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 21:04 PMOsinyagov IMO, M5 should not be in the doctrine, since it is basic unit for Red Army One can use the M3 for USF mechanized commander instead of the M5... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 18 Feb 2020, 23:41 PM Main problem of Axis armor is not their own performance but the performance of the Allied TD... Other than I would test redesigning the unit with the following goals: Increase units tenacity while lowering its lethality. Add utility instead of killing power like: Extra damage vs buildings especially to the barrage Superior modifiers vs cover/garrison similar to flame tanks Critical affects on targets like: vs vehicles injured gunner/loader/driver vs infantry/team weapons new critical "shell shock" penalties to ROF/accuracy/ damage Now the units is designed to spear head attack allot like Churchill and counter buildings and units in cover. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Puma changes18 Feb 2020, 23:32 PM Imo there are number of step that should be taken: 1) Puma build-able from T0 (same solution with 250, Panzer J). Reasons: It is a doctrinal unit and should be available regardless of building choice. The reason for not being a call-in is simply that instant production of a counter to all light is a major advantage that should not be available. 2) If the timing of T2 is to early and of T3 too late (although if suggestion one is implemented one could produce the Puma without the T2 building) add a separate "tech" button in T0 taking around 1-2 minutes to research at no cost and add what ever prerequest needed. (or add a small cost similar to AEC but knock off the price a bit since it inferior to OKW one for the same price) 3) Remove Command Panzer from the commander. Reasons: The unit has become UP because of the synergy in this particular commander Suggestions: Redesign the Commando Panzer changing with 2 fire modes, indirect similar to Stug-E but less range direct similar to the current but Hollow charge round with no AI. Make the unit either call-in with CP or buildable form T0 with tech requirement. Change the vet bonuses change and add bonus to aura. Separate aura to 2 one passive 0.90 target and damage reduction as a active timed limited. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Salvage18 Feb 2020, 18:54 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 18:37 PMCreativeName ... 4. as Latch said, its more reliable. Happens way to often that my tank misses a at gun 3times in a row and the opponent is able to reclaim the at gun ... The chance of Sherman firing at AT gun at range 20 and missing 3 times in a row is 1.5% (and 5.3 vs RW). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Feedback for winter preview18 Feb 2020, 17:56 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 17:24 PMdreamerdude why are they having medics as a buildable thing when you can just make an outpost next to your base with medics? Actually if the base medic thing go ahead Forward assembly should lose the medic upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for winter preview18 Feb 2020, 17:54 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 17:14 PMSuperHansFan They are literally in the same class. Both 60 range TDs, just jagdpanzer gets defensive vet while FF vet is offensive. JP is the best nondoc counter to British heavy tanks axis have. It eats Churchill's for breakfast better than panther or StuG. And it also beats FF head on in 1vs1 due to superior DPS. So there's not much logic OKW having cheaper vehicle popcap when their repairs need one Sturm at most (thanks to mech truck) while Brits you're looking at multiple RE squads No they are not. Compare their penetration and you will see why. One can simply upgrade his Ro.E to heavy sapper to repair ones Churchill. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for winter preview18 Feb 2020, 17:09 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 16:56 PMSuperHansFan ... In the current meta they are just vet sponges for tigers anyway. Revert Churchill nerf and bring FF pop into line with other TDs like jagdpanzer... FF is a heavy Tank counter and its Pop is fine Jagpanzer is medium tank counter and should have its pop reduced. In: COH2 Balance