Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 7 Nov 2017, 16:17 PM The real question is does hmg34 have to much damage far to require a nerf to it DPS? If not the damage lost from new crew weapons should be move to the gun itself. Then it would be a "bug" fix as advertised and not a balance change. In: Lobby
Thread: 17 Pounder vs Pak 437 Nov 2017, 15:21 PM According to the stats I am looking the XP value is identical for Ostheer and 17p, OKW has about half that for vet 1. There should be little on difference for penetrated shot on the same value targets for Osth/17P while the OKW should vet around twice as fast. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Question regarding buletin7 Nov 2017, 12:16 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2017, 11:51 AMDersyoid As example, if I put 3% more penetration buletin on Raketen. Does that apply to other AT guns I stolen lets say ZIS gun? you can find the info here since it case by case: https://coh2db.com/bulletins/index In: Lobby
Thread: BDP Garrison and ungarrison changes - Do we like them?7 Nov 2017, 11:02 AM Unit that can move whiled cloaked shout have their explosive grenade replaced by DOT ones. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 7 Nov 2017, 09:22 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2017, 09:16 AMSwitzerland In my opinion as stated for DBP, it seems to be fine lol. If an MG wiped a squad so fast that you could kill a squad and re-face for a flank like you seem to be implying that would be a bit silly. 1 MG isnt meant to stop flanks either thats why its a support weapon. Videos seem to show it does its job, what job would you like it to do? Imo a hmg should make players think twice before attacking a hmg frontally and allow them to act as spotters for their mortar. It clear that in your opinion the unit is fine. Noted. Thanks for testing the unit and sharing your experience. In: Lobby
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 7 Nov 2017, 09:13 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2017, 09:08 AMSwitzerland Are you sating MG's should be killing units when your opponent uses green cover? The MG did the job of an MG, it suppressed the squad, it did the bonus of killing it, while in no cover itself. Seems fine to me. Little damage means that one can leave his squad taking fire for 1 minute or more and have the time one needs to flank, mortar, or counter the HMG any other way he likes with little to lose. Once more in your opinion does MG34 in live have too much damage and deserves a nerf? In: Lobby
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 7 Nov 2017, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2017, 08:57 AMSwitzerland The test just there, its in the DBP. Suppresses and kills the squad in yellow cover without dying. So problem is? Purpose of the MG was never damage so the issue is? 2 and 40 second to kill a single squad is yellow cover, while losing 2 members, is that in your opinion a satisfactory performance? You want to try it vs green cover and see what happens? Once more units that do no damage do not get veterancy. Can you explain pls why in your opinion the MG34 in live deserves a nerf in DPS? Was it doing too much damage? Does the change actually make the unit more balanced? In: Lobby
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 7 Nov 2017, 08:55 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2017, 23:01 PMSwitzerland Can we limit the new threads Vipper can make? seriously? they are all regarding Axis units so far or fears of overbuff on allied ones... The MG34 has 0 indented purpose to be high damage. It suppresses perfectly fine. Id take a damage nerf on the Vickers to suppress any day. The whole point of the DBP is to get feedback and the point of this thread is to provide that feedback. Actually we already have established that there is a "bug" (mistake) in Conscripts DPS values. So I really see no reason to limit the number of threads, unless a moderator ask me to. A unit that does little damage has little chance of gaining veterancy. MG34 in live does not have high damage, it has low damage yet with patch the mg team will probably lose something like 25-35% far DPS which makes little sense. Can you PLS test the HMG34 in the DBP and share your experience. If in your opinion a allied unit has been overnerfed or an axis units overbuffed pls me let know which one and I will be happy to test. In: Lobby
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 6 Nov 2017, 22:53 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2017, 19:23 PMEtherealDragon ... I seriously doubt the crew shooting at long-max range in the live game adds a significant amount of damage anyway so why is it's DPS suddenly an issue?... Instead of doubting why don't you simply check the numbers? At range 35 the hmg34 has a DPS 4.6 The crew has 5.4 I would also suggest that you actually test it in game the unit see how it perform and share your experience. In: Lobby
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 6 Nov 2017, 17:48 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2017, 17:39 PMEtherealDragon Except the the Maxim is getting a buff because it's not functioning well as a HMG (you know, serving as a suppression platform). The MG-34 doesn't have bad everything... it's just a cheaper, lower damage MG-42 (unless you also think that has bad suppression and deployment time). The changes in maxim are rather irrelevant to the changes HMG34. The unit simply does very very little damage at long ranges and has trouble suppressing in long ranges. Low damage mean low XP gain. If you read OP you will see that in my test it took 6 min of continues fire to kill a conscript squad and failed to even suppress tommies after firing for 7.5 minutes. Pls test the unit and share your experience. In: Lobby