Profile of OrangePest

Did you already forget when you challenged me to a 1v1 and then immedatly backtracked LOL

Uh yeah dont mind this?

Tested the mod, seems decent so far, not sure if I'm a fan of the forced nade tech, but it's probably necessary due to timings. (otherwise, you could have some stupidly early LVHs.)
Not keen on the major teching cost either, i always feel like it's not worth teching up due to the lackluster performance of the sherman (and you could just as easily get a pershing instead) so something could be done there.

But honestly USFs main issue is that the riflemen aren't that good anymore and the weird teching that forces you to pick either captain or liuetenant, which means losing out on 50cal or at gun, my personal solution would be to put them both in your base building and having them be unlocked when you tech captain or lefty.

You claimed sight and weapon block a stun, which is not a stun by literally any definition.


Because there needs to exist a reason to pick it over Jackson.


And I have brought up the fact that all vehicle based stuns were removed from the game or changed into soft CC, where you are free to bail your vehicle if you wish, which is the exact cast with this one.


And for that I'm going to try a different approach this time.

"You claimed sight and weapon block a stun, which is not a stun by literally any definition."

It's similar enough that the argument will stand on its own anyway, Yes I messed that up but the point of my argument is that it only needs one, not both, putting more stuns into the game is unnecessary, But I should've clarified so that's my fault.

"Because there needs to exist a reason to pick it over Jackson."
I agree with the sentiment, but giving it stun is not the way to go, I'd rather just keep the HE and remove the sight block and vehicle disable.

"And I have brought up the fact that all vehicle based stuns were removed from the game or changed into soft CC, where you are free to bail your vehicle if you wish, which is the exact cast with this one."

While I understand your point overall, in theory, I'd agree. but in practice that's usually just not the case, if someone hits you with a stun they can just simply push up and fuck your face without you able to do little about it, (barring outside interference like AT guns, but they cannot be there at all times.)
Additionally, in a two on two tank engagement having the ability to make a tank useless for a duration of the fight can make you win without much skill involved. I could drone and drone on about it, but i think i've explained why i dislike stun-like mechanics in the game.

"And for that I'm going to try a different approach this time."
Thank you.

M10 still needs the stun removed, too much in one for very little cost, HE is fine having stun and he however is not.