VOTE NOWWWWWWWW

edit:
Background for this poll - Relic asking for feedback CoH1 vs CoH2:
https://www.coh2.org/topic/62130/relic-wanted-feedback-for-coh1-vs-coh2
 
	
 
    		            							
			    		Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15


Posts: 712

 
    		            							
			    		Posts: 1467 | Subs: 4
I think the correct way to go on coh3 is sticking to ww2, i would chose the pacific war or the afrikan theather. Then release the soviets and western front armies in dlc

Posts: 424 | Subs: 2
I think the correct way to go on coh3 is sticking to ww2, i would chose the pacific war or the afrikan theather. Then release the soviets and western front armies in dlc

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
I think the correct way to go on coh3 is sticking to ww2, i would chose the pacific war or the afrikan theather. Then release the soviets and western front armies in dlc

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

Posts: 284 | Subs: 1

Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2

Posts: 712

Posts: 99

 
    		            							
			    		Posts: 1156 | Subs: 1

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

Posts: 4

Posts: 593
Afrika Korps with Rommel in a singleplayer campaign leading up to the end of Italy. If done correctly, would be amazing to have in CoH3. That way we have half desert maps, half Italian maps. I was thinking of adding the Italian faction, but the Italians were sorta obsolete after 1941.....
Or
We could add the pacific theater. The only problem is the Japanese had inferior weapons and resources compared to the U.S., especially towards the end of the war.
Whatever the case, CoH3 needs something unique to make it stand out, especially considering how repetitive WW2 games seem to be.

Posts: 593

Posts: 593

Posts: 19

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
 
  
 

Posts: 1740

Posts: 4
|   |   |   | 71 | ||
|   |   |   | 17 | ||
|   |   |   | 3 | ||
|   |   |   | 3 | ||
|   |   |   | 2 | ||
|   |   |   | 1 | 
 cblanco ★
									cblanco ★								 보드카 중대
									보드카 중대								 VonManteuffel
									VonManteuffel								 Heartless Jäger
									Heartless Jäger								 
											 
								
								