Sappers flamethrower - Damage against cover

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

http://stat.coh2.hu/weapon.php?filename=tommy_flamethrower

Acc Dmg Supp Pen
Heavy 1 2 0.1 1
Light 1 1.25 0.5 1

http://stat.coh2.hu/weapon.php?filename=pioneer_flamethrower_mp

Heavy 1 1.25 0.1 1
Light 1 1 0.5 1

http://stat.coh2.hu/weapon.php?filename=flamethrower_roks3_mp

Heavy 1 1.25 0.1 1
Light 1 1 0.5 1

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1617

Can you add the RE's flamer and the Sturmpio's flamer to see the big picture?

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

So tommy flamethrower does 2x the dmg while others do 1.25x? Guess cause they are britz lul

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

Relic.... just...

Posts: 378

26 Mar 2016, 17:05 PMThunderhun

Can you add the RE's flamer and the Sturmpio's flamer to see the big picture?

RET flamer is same with Assault Engineer.

	Acc	Dmg	Supp	Pen
Heavy	1	1.25	0.1	1
Light	1	1	0.5	1

OKW flamer is same with ostheer one.

What do you expect from Relic's cash cow commander?

Posts: 680

Hmmm... Will have to abus... I mean try this.

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

Was it really that hard to just copy the same flamer relic. A noob modder could've done that.

But there may be a reason for this...? Only way I can imagine this being for real

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

watching hans vs jove right now and i noticed that the tommy flamer seems to have a very short cooldown between its flame bursts, true or just subjective observation?

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

27 Mar 2016, 16:19 PMBananenheld

watching hans vs jove right now and i noticed that the tommy flamer seems to have a very short cooldown between its flame bursts, true or just subjective observation?

That's partly correct.
The fire_aim_time for british, usf and axis flamers: 0.125
The fire_aim_time for soviet flamer : 0.125-0.5

Whatever it is in CoH2. If it's russian. It's inferior.

Posts: 196

Looks like a unintended mistake.

IF they wanted to really to entice spending they'd broken the Landmattress.

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

27 Mar 2016, 16:53 PMRedT3rror

That's partly correct.
The fire_aim_time for british, usf and axis flamers: 0.125
The fire_aim_time for soviet flamer : 0.125-0.5

Whatever it is in CoH2. If it's russian. It's inferior.

what you expect from drunken ruskis

Posts: 851 | Subs: 1

So, it appears Brits are OP in yet another unit...

Posts: 959

27 Mar 2016, 16:53 PMRedT3rror

Whatever it is in CoH2. If it's russian. It's inferior.

Posts: 1384

They copied the old flamers from before flame damage was nerfed a few months ago guys. Clearly an accident.

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29

Those flamer changes were 7 months ago? Pretty lazy

Playercard of tightrope

1v1: P	2v2: None	3v3: None	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: None	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P

Multi Quote

Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3

Hey, everyone knows that british fire is superior to all other types of fire.

Posts: 509 | Subs: 1

Game's DEAD. Next topic.

Posts: 1384

4 Apr 2016, 06:52 AMtightrope

Those flamer changes were 7 months ago? Pretty lazy

Chances are the guys working on new content aren't the guys actively working on multiplayer. Probably just copied a flamer from SP or something. (Maybe Brit campaign considering it's called tommies flamer?)

Relic has always had these sorts of issues. The guys who make the campaign/theatre of war etc aren't privy to balance necessities and seemingly no one thinks to check this stuff ever, it's always the community that finds it.