Profile of Phy

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Tric maps and peoples response18 Jul 2019, 19:03 PM Map is as good as prypiat imo. So elevation is the least. PS: Stuve now is banned from Tric's twitch channel. Welcome to the club. In: Mapping Discussion
Thread: Move Conscripts 7th man from t4 to t3?17 Jun 2019, 19:25 PM Cons still disappointing even with the upgrade. Dunno if its a matter of timing only though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.024 Apr 2019, 19:39 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Apr 2019, 23:58 PMdistrofio To spot for TD? To capture VPs under fire? To chase and snare tanks without loosing too much resources/value? LOL. Literally nohing for 240mp... besides you can use any other unit or ability for those roles and get something else in reward. Nice design: core SU infantry role is spot for td, cap under fire (LOL unique ability of cons isnt it?) and chase tanks to snare...what a joke. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.021 Apr 2019, 21:37 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2019, 20:59 PMmiragefla Stock Conscripts do not need to be great at attacking like Penals. It’s not their role given outside of Molotovs where you need bodies to close in and still have firepower left. They have more utility and we also want to emphasize that. If Conscripts were just as good at attacking, why get Penals? They’re more meant to be supporting the rest of the Soviet line through screening, AT grenades, reinforcement, cover construction, etc. Population they might drop to 6 or the upgrade might give other bonuses if they are still lacklustre. Yeah, good theory design of conscripts. But fact is, with this approach nobody uses cons because why you want a sponge unit when you can have penals? This approach has been taken over the years and just lead cons into oblivion. Theres no other army in all game which mainline infantry is not worth building. I'd rather make cons good (with upgrades through tech) and be penals like an specialized AT unit with ptrs. Or any other approach, but man, cons being crap support cheap unit is just a big no. Not realiable, not funny to play with. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.019 Apr 2019, 22:04 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2019, 18:28 PMWingZero Cons need LMGs - I think that 7 man con upgrade is just MP draining. +1. This rework tbh is 0 appealing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Map List 2019 - REVAMP23 Mar 2019, 10:55 AM Duclair and ecliptic fields are awesome. I'd like to see them. In: Lobby
Thread: New Commander patchnotes discussion thread22 Mar 2019, 13:10 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Mar 2019, 19:28 PMnigo More Rangers ? Time to suggest this: The balance/ mod team can take a look at the Ranger skin? Relic placed a Ranger skin almost identical to the Riflemans (light brown skins), but theres a proper Ranger skin in game files with dark green pants and a cool backpack (they appear in SP campaign). Its a more distinguish skin and deserve to appear in the MP. +1 In: Lobby
Thread: COH1 4ES strategy for Soviets?17 Feb 2019, 21:50 PM Pretty much what nosliw said. I dont see the point of pure 4es as it was in coh1. OFFTOPIC: -Can't tell how much I enjoyed watching marinez replays using 4es strat. -Can't tell how much I enjoyed using 4es strat on my own. Nostalgia. In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 6 Feb 2019, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2019, 12:13 PMWiderstreit I like the ideas. Even the Granatwerfers for OKW could be able too use incendiary rounds, so they are special. a. Opelblitz as US ambulance b. Sdkfz. 251 like Ostheer +1. However, assault package needs a buff too. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When can we see the hotfix?2 Feb 2019, 11:33 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2019, 11:10 AMSturmpanther It will be not only patch for JLI What other things are being touched. In: COH2 Gameplay