Ardennes Assault - USF 81mm Mortar

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15

Posts: 309

SP only?

Posts: 1617

Is it just me or the Ardennes Assault's USF looks more balanced and potent for multiplayer than the current USF?

Posts: 431 | Subs: 1

Would love to have this unit and on mp not as doctrinal unit.

Posts: 1617

^^ Well, it's certanly better than the Pack Howie...I say the 81mm would be amazing in T2 (Lt post) to counter Mgs.

Posts: 4928

9 Nov 2014, 16:04 PMThunderhun

Is it just me or the Ardennes Assault's USF looks more balanced and potent for multiplayer than the current USF?

Ironically, it is. Cavalry Riflemen, Rangers, Mortar, who wants to bet they'll have 76mm Shermans too?

Posts: 422 | Subs: 3

10 Nov 2014, 02:55 AMMr. Someguy

Ironically, it is. Cavalry Riflemen, Rangers, Mortar, who wants to bet they'll have 76mm Shermans too?

Those are already in world builder so why not

(76mm sherman atleast)

Posts: 1158

9 Nov 2014, 16:04 PMThunderhun

Is it just me or the Ardennes Assault's USF looks more balanced and potent for multiplayer than the current USF?

Your not alone, USF has felt incomplete since it's introduction. OKW seems so in a way also, but I haven't messed with them yet, so I don't know for sure.

29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:

T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.

Multi Quote

Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8

9 Nov 2014, 15:10 PMHappyPhace

SP only?

Yes, because AA is sp only expansion.

Its not that hard to get it people.

Single player exclusive expansion=single player exclusive units.

No rocket science, so stop asking when every new USF AA exclusive unit gets released.

Remember that even soviet guards are different in SP and MP.

25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.

Good Stuff here

Multi Quote

Posts: 4928

10 Nov 2014, 17:55 PMSirlami

Those are already in world builder so why not (76mm sherman atleast)

They were also in WFA's announcement trailer, but were cut in favor of the weaker 75mm for some reason.

Posts: 824

10 Nov 2014, 18:31 PMVaz

Your not alone, USF has felt incomplete since it's introduction. OKW seems so in a way also, but I haven't messed with them yet, so I don't know for sure.

OKW is incomplete and to cover this they had to make certain units OP for OKW, which leads ot players complaints about OKW. It is a vicious cycle of multiplayer madness.

Posts: 3293

some minor cleaning lets refrain from name calling. just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean you get to call them a name...

i mean out of all the things you could have said and we reverted to name calling...

Failure is always an option.

It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)

Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences.

To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage!

and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!

Multi Quote

Posts: 1617

10 Nov 2014, 18:31 PMVaz

Your not alone, USF has felt incomplete since it's introduction. OKW seems so in a way also, but I haven't messed with them yet, so I don't know for sure.

That's the point...both OKW and USF lacks a few core elements which make an army an army, right now WFA cannot counter some strategies, units because of the crap faction design.

This problem is in COH 1 (Brits + PE)...I hope Relic is aware of this issue as it can lead to exploits and UP/OP balance in the future.