Profile of Burts

How to fix soviets

buff t-34/76
buff su-85
buff su-76


Soviets = fixed.


Conscripts are fine, penals are slightly underperforming perhaps, shocks are fine, gaurds are slightly underperforming as both AT and AI and of course partisans and irregurals are underperforming... Not to mention some lackluster commander abilities here and there...


The soviet faction design is a different topic, if you don't like it, simply make a mod and that's it.

Without a replay it's very hard to point out what mistakes exactly you did.


Generally tho i don't see how P-47 negates axis T3. As wehrmacht you need to think that tanks are not your primary force.

Your primary source comes in the form of LMG grens and PaKs and perhaps mg 42s. Use these units correctly and you will win.


Unless you overextend your tanks, they should not die to a signle P-47 run. And of course you always need to have double PaKs gaurding your tanks. Airborne lacks good indirect fire options unless he goes for pak howi which means that he has no reliable way of dislodging your paks. Always have double PaKs supporting your tank, no matter what it is.


Versus LMG airborne you either need to use well positioned MG 42s, double team it with LMG grenadiers, or like you said use a tank with PaK support.


Keep in mind that double paks two shot every single USF tank except the bulldozer, which USF cannot access if he goes airborne.

If he goes for M8 scott,which any good USF player will do, considering getting a 251 halftrack to keep your PaKs alive.

In the early game a 222 is very useful, keep in mind that airborne have no AT so they are very vulnerable to any kind of vehicles. Using an ostwind for anti air is generally not preferable, since it costs alot, but if you manage to keep your 222 alive it also can perform an anti air role, making it shoot down the occasional P-47.

Always consider some panzershreck PGrens for additional AT power, or if the map is more urban and double PaK can be more easily flanked.


If you are particuraly desperate, consider buying the mechanized assault commander and use STUG E and tiger to basically hardcounter USF.

Cruzz, can you do something about the recon support company off map combat group?

That ability is really not worth 900mp...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Market_Garden
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Monte_Cassino

These are but a few examples of superior German leadership, training, weapons and infantry turning the tide of battle, and defeating much larger Allied forces that also had air superiority. A user(Affe I think? I'm not quite sure on the spelling) had quite a detailed list of battles post-Battle of Stalingrad where the Germans slaughtered Americans and Russians in great numbers, and even launched counter offensives despite having no air support and were heavily outnumbered.

To answer your question of "where did these battle hardened troops come from?", my answer is troops who fought in the early war(Battle of Poland, Battle of Denmark, Battle of France and etc) as well as in Russia. A lot of these troops had more experience than any other nation in the war except maybe for the Japanese, and so they carried their experience and skills over into the later stages of the war; the Obersoldaten are a direct homage to those very troops who survived the countless battles from the late 1930's until late 44'.

The CoH franchise prides itself on its stellar gameplay mechanics and historical authenticity, which is why nerfing the Obersoldaten to make them like any other infantry is an error of the highest magnitude. The Obersoldaten are supposed to be the best infantry in the game, and even now Shocks and conscripts/US rifles can defeat Obersoldatens if they're supported with light artillery(Mortars and etc) and light vehicles. The Germans were the most elite in WW2 so obviously the Obersoldaten should reflect that since CoH2 is supposed to be historically authentic.

One of your examples of superior german leadership shows a german defeat, and you keep showing operation market garden like it was the most crushing defeat the allies had. Yes, even in 1944 germans could still win battles, not denying that.


Still no evidence of that "slaughter" of russian and american forces.


Also lol at japanese being well trained troops, what are you even smoking?


Yeah, sure the germans launched counterattacks with very little air support and whatever, and you know what ? They all failed miserably.



The troops that survived from the start of the war to 1944-45 barely existed. Sure there were a few, but these kind of people very rare due to the nature of infantry combat.
And there is absolutely no evidence that more germans had more of these troops than anyone else, considering that their divisions were constantly getting annihilated and reffited over and over again.

Keep in mind that OKW starts with 40 fuel, while soviets do to, they will usually use it for molotovs and at nades.


So the maths are even more in favor of OKW here.