Profile of Australian Magic

Jump back to quoted post14 Feb 2015, 19:33 PMAlexzandvar

Because it's the best counter, why do I have to go Jaeger Armor or Luftwaffe supply to counter artillery? Why do I have to go elefant or Jadgtiger to counter the IS2? Why do I have to go air borne to counter Heavy Armor? The answer is, because that's how the game works at the moment.

Should this be changed? Yes I believe that 100%, but it doesn't mean counters in the game don't exist. And you don't need B4 to counter Panther, there are far more units that can do that. For instance 1 AT grenade and a AT gun for example



No one ever said it was good design, but Soviets at the current time are entirely based around picking your commanders right. OKW for instance, is based around picking what armor you build right.

Jump back to quoted post14 Feb 2015, 19:50 PMKatitof

Is any of the allied stuff you mentioned non doctrinal?
Its alright if you need doctrine to help you counter other doctrine.

Its bad balance if you need doctrine to counter stock units.

Jump back to quoted post14 Feb 2015, 17:56 PMPorygon

57mm penetration was like that since COH1, but they never disappointed me, L2P.
It is already much better, AP round much cheaper, more accurate and having permanent spotter. #lowskillfriendlyRelic

Jump back to quoted post14 Feb 2015, 17:07 PMAlexzandvar

USF has the best AT gun, Soviet if you count the fact it can also barrage infantry. The Jackson is bar none the best TD in the game, and none of the standard non-doctrine TD preform well against Heavy tanks.

And you keep seem to forgot that Allies have the best indirect fire in the game, what is with you and ignoring allies strengths? A single shot from a B4 on a HQ can be GG, a single 120mm mortar shell can wipe a Obers squad, A katyusha can easily wipe multiple squads. Demo charges are a for sure squad wipe on anything near them!