Wait, 2015 roadmap in 2016?
Welcome to the world of game development

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Thread: 2016 Roadmap 21 Mar 2016, 21:54 PM
Welcome to the world of game development ![]() In: Lobby |
Thread: Game breaking exploit 21 Mar 2016, 20:33 PM
Hardly gamebreaking, old and known. In: COH2 Bugs |
Thread: Allow load outs that are connected to maps. 21 Mar 2016, 18:28 PM
You're not meant to be prepared for anything and everything. Bulletins are not half as important as you think they are. Go with meta commander, there is one suitable for 90% of the map and for that single remaining one you can have backups. In: Lobby |
Thread: Royal Engineers are broken21 Mar 2016, 14:54 PM
royal engies are op as fuck , just watch any of Price's games as brits , he abuses the hell out of them . If we go by what sprice does to judge what is OP, then this is the list of OP things: Pios puppchens ostwinds PaKs conscripts t34/76 PIATs Zooks US AT gun sandbags wires pathfiunders JLI obers ISGs mortars(all of them) stugs pumas osttruppen thompson vehicle crews The list could go on. So yeah, I wouldn't really rely on what sprice does as an accurate measurement of what is OP and what isn't ![]() In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Royal Engineers are broken21 Mar 2016, 14:41 PM
With a fifth man in the squad RE even beat assault grenadiers (280mp) in close combat. What doesn't beat assault grens? In their case, you pay 280mp for a crippled squad that doesn't scale. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Soviet faction21 Mar 2016, 10:27 AM
Dude, again, you're a virgin talking sex. You barely left placement with soviets and you think you know stuff? Alright, lets do it another way: If soviets are so fine and everything, why you struggle to have 40% W/L ratio? Ohh right, because you don't play the faction and when you do, you suck hard, which disqualifies you BY DEFAULT from any kind of statement that would be either "objective" or "based on facts". ![]() You're also so self deluded that you don't even see what I type, I didn't said said soviets are weak in this thread, not even once. Some units are, the units you claim to be fine and refuse to prove it. Apparently high level streamers and other players also refuse to show these "fine" units in action as maxim spam and doctrinal armor is all that is used, you use anything else, you've lose, which the ESL you try to back yourself with just yesterday showed at best that you're clueless lunatic who have no idea what he talks about. ![]() Also, I LOVE how you tried to use my quote in the last line WHILE HAVING 40% win loss ration with the faction in question. ![]() So how about this, you stay away from the thread(or any balance thread), until you actually will have more then 50% wins with every faction you want to talk about in the mode you play the most and no, placement games do not count. ![]() Please, make sure you are skilled enough to talk about balance first and in the mean time, let the grown ups talk. ![]() In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Soviet faction20 Mar 2016, 15:33 PM
In your head mostly. Less damage, worse scaling, no stock weapon upgrades, if you go for doctrinal ones, you can't upgrade them on enemy territory, if you think AT nades side upgrade are in any way, shape or form better then then no side cost tech shrecks, then you're more deluded then Trump and ISIS put together. You also seem to forget that volks also have molotovs, with longer range, much faster throw and no side tech. OKW have even more of these elite infantry and some of it is even stock. There is nothing cons do that volks wouldn't do better and you're still insisting on volks being better. That is some zealous level of self delusion there, you might need a specialists help. I'll take Conscripts over Volks any day. Then you're even more stupid then aaa and lolcake put together. Russian armour is good and the only reason why you don't find them good is because you aren't using them right. Russian armour isn't meant to trade in a slugging match(If you really want to though, the IS2 or ISU allows the possibility), but rather to support your main force, flanks and etc. Show us replays of your play, where you use T34/76 right. No further argument. Show us, we'll believe you. If you're unable to produce one, then stop with that verbal diarrhea about soviet armor being good. Lights are good, T4 is not, you're forced for doctrinal armor every-single-game. You also have numerical superiority which is important in 1v1's where map presence is important. I've never played a game against the Rus faction where I've had more tanks than them; every Rus player I've squared off against always had armour superiority. Numerical advantage is pure bullshit. You can't outnumber infantry that costs just as much, you can't outnumber tanks that have comparable menpower and pop costs. Also, your games against hard AI in 4v4 doesn't count, so produce a better argument, because what you say is not even close to what is actually happening in game. The faction can survive without call ins, you just aren't playing them correctly. Try 1v1's and experience how powerful they are. You don't even need to play 1v1's, look at ESL tournament games where the Rus faction is the most picked and won the most games. Must be why all the doctrines are viable. Oh wait, they are not, if you're not using specific 2-3 doctrines with very specific call-ins, you're playing on backfoot pretty much every single time unless you play vs players who are warrioring zealously only one side, have no slightest clue on how to play or counter another and therefore have no slightest experience with allies, like this for example: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197990448040 You're so deluded about the faction, because you've never played it. You have no clue about the economy, about the micro, about how the engagements are going, because you've never played it. You're basically a virgin, screaming how horrible sex is. Unless you'll actually PLAY the faction, you have no saying in any thread regarding the factions problems, so if you want to discuss factions problems, be sure its axis as that is the only side you have even moderate comprehension of. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Royal Engineers are broken19 Mar 2016, 20:37 PM
Or seriousness. I wish best of luck to anyone trying to mimic sprice spams. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Best strategies and units, which exist no more19 Mar 2016, 17:28 PM
4 minute flame 251 with brit release churchill croc strength of flamer, but 2 of them. In: Lobby |
Thread: Royal Engineers are broken19 Mar 2016, 16:54 PM
Well, if you drop 60 fuel and 120 muni worth of upgrades, then no, it doesn't. In: COH2 Balance |
|
|
|
53 | ||
|
|
|
50 | ||
|
|
|
40 |
cblanco ★
보드카 중대
VonManteuffel
Heartless Jäger