Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Spring update from design point of view. 19 Apr 2018, 11:13 AM USF M15 does not really start as reinforce platform, does it? USF M5 is literally copy pasted soviet M5. In: Lobby
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread19 Apr 2018, 11:12 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2018, 11:01 AMAlphrum and so we should listen to people like you who don't even play the game, ok cool. I did fight against rank 1 and rank 2 Players in my most played game mode and beat them together with Zarok. Neither of us is a top 10 player. Did you? I am living example that knowing how to use shit bests your ability to click 400 times a minute. Despite me playing rarely, I was never below 400 rank. You should listen to people who actually understand the game, it does not directly translate to high ranks, but it helps. Also, neither of the modders who do the changes is a top player, so yeah, you should listen to people with a clue, even if their personal ability limits them in ranks. Its too easy to spot the ones who do not have any idea on how to play as they usually advocate for exclusively one faction buffs and all other nerfs, ullumulu would be a dictrionary example of that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread19 Apr 2018, 11:00 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2018, 10:56 AMsiddolio To be good at coh you dont need good micro, you need pratical knowledge about the game. How to use units, cover. If youre low rank you probably dont understand how to play coh in general, not that your micro is bad. This. This is also why People with most 'balance' Problems are alway 4 Digit below 1 WL People of one faction. You limit yourself to tiny part of the game and refuse to learn even that tiny part, you can have best micro in the world and you will still suck, because you will try to use gren blob against tanks, which is not that rare from bottom tier players who spam balance threads. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring update from design point of view. 19 Apr 2018, 10:34 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2018, 08:26 AMVipper Actually M3 has very little reason to the only half-truck to provide healing in the first place. 251 have very little reason to be the only ht with ability to clear garrisons post upgrade. soviet M5 have very little reason to be the only ht that can take down planes and suppress post upgrade. British M5 have very little reason to be the only ht to provide weapon upgrades for everyone. Its almost as if devs wanted to create a varied and interesting Units instead of homogenized carbon copies of each other. In: Lobby
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread19 Apr 2018, 10:27 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2018, 07:57 AMferwiner This unit is sadly a design fail, as it completely shifts ballance by allowing soviets to use 2 british lmgs per each conscript squad in team games. This is why I can understand making it expensive enough not to be viable, although I would definitely like to see some clever redesign. Maybe it should be able to build racks on the field instead of actual weapons so that other team members can't use them? or maybe it should be a rack itself? I don't even know if it is possible to implement. You might want to read previous patch patch-notes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread19 Apr 2018, 04:47 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 21:28 PMStorm Elite Can anyone explain what the new 222 armor numbers mean? Is the 222 FINALLY, after YEARS, going to be an actual ARMORED car that is immune to rifle fire? Or is this just some symbolic buff that won't actually affect damage taken from any practical sources, in the same way all changes to the 222 over the past two years have been entirely pointless and failing to make it viable as pseudo-light armor? It wasn't immune in real life(carbines and HMGs didn't really struggled with making it a swiss cheese), why would it be immune in game? It'll simply be MUCH more resistant to small arms fire. Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2018, 01:07 AMStorm Elite Meanwhile, the Greyhound takes zero shots to kill with rifles, because it DOESN'T TAKE BULLET DAMAGE. "Between armored cars and light armor"?? The 222 IS supposed to be an armored car. I don't understand this absurd insistance on keeping it unviable by making it take damage from bullets. There WHOLE point of ANY kind of light armored vehicle is to harass infantry. If it can't do that, there is absolutely no reason to use it. Greyhound is: -more expensive -doctrinal -arriving later -AI only despite having supposedly better gun, 222 already rips it to shreds. -actually better armored then 222 And 222 is multirole cheap vehicle. Its somewhat effective anti tair with 7,5% chance to kill planes with every shot. Its alright as assist against infantry. It rips completely all lights below light tanks and a pair will hardcounter AEC, which is more then twice as expensive to get then single 222. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 20:49 PMsiddolio The people that see the Panther hp/armour switcheroo as a nerf dont seem to understand that hp offers far better survivability than armour. The repair time is totally irrelevant when you will finally be able to use a Panther productively and actually kill things. Absolute statement of game understanding if you'd rather have high armour than high hp. You think mediums are gonna pen 260 armour reliably? Should we remind people that churchills losing HP and gaining armor was a major survivability nerf? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 20:26 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 20:24 PMDangerous-Cloth So you guys nerf brumble, reduce Ostheer Panther armor so it can get penetrated by mediums more easily, increase its cost, without decreasing tier 4 teching cost, making tier 4 in 1v1 a luxury still, which is now also less potent than before. You then nerf the tier 3 crutch too? You guys gone loonie? I like the part where you completely ignored HP increase, return of armor vet, RoF increase(aka DPS increase) and accuracy increase. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 20:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 20:16 PMDangerous-Cloth Nerf ppsh cons? Wut? But double bar riflemen is fine?! Lol? Well, cons are pretty potent at vet3, however before vet3 they still are pretty shitty. Reliable, but shitty, even with ppsh as they die like flies. I'd be fine with ppsh change if cons vet was slightly readjusted, moving part of vet3 durability to vet2 and vet2 accuracy to vet3, then increase in power would be less exponential between vet 0-2 and vet 3, making ppsh look viable with 2 guns, however the cost to dps increase ratio is just.... bad with 2 guns. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 18:13 PM Best allied stock med have penetration of 135 at close range? Vs 270 armor. Do the math, its not hard, I believe in you. In: COH2 Balance