Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Cons vs Penals29 Aug 2018, 15:01 PM https://www.coh2.org/topic/82219/conscripts-vs-penals-vs-guards In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch29 Aug 2018, 14:32 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2018, 14:16 PMullumulu here is an example why is it a bad idea to give brits pios an snare: https://youtu.be/SVM_kzZRzxY?t=2698 They have really exellent AT with double piats and can manage to kill by itsself allie panther and brumbar... A bad play is not example of anything other then a bad reckless play. Most players don't park directly in front of 2 AT squads. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch29 Aug 2018, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2018, 11:56 AMKirrik Why give m42 160/80/60 pen instead of 120/100/80 though? It's only AT gun with this kind of weird power hike of pen power at close range. Also why no go futher with it and remove green cover bonus from crew but make it faster in stealth and retreatable like raketen? Puma has that profile as well, however, contrary to ATGs, puma can actually close in and keep itself there as well as is mobile. In: Lobby
Thread: Conscripts Vs Penals Vs Guards29 Aug 2018, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2018, 10:40 AMOnimusha Gj if you can rush KT on late game with so many squads and muni to button e throw 2 satchels and run away, okw infantry? Suppression? KT micro? Opponents is supposed to be on the keyboard. Penals with ptrs are really bad like AI on every stage of the game, and Obers , man obers rape guards, giving the guard vet3 a chanche to win engaments against obers vet 0 is not so terrible. You have forgotten who you reply to, so let me remind - its a person who would reverse into your force with no support and complain how OP PTRS is. As for the topic - each to its own, they are all completely different units with completely different roles, costs and strategies to follow, however cons are the worst choice unless you go for ppsh doctrine. Luckily, there is one with both, guards and ppsh. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch28 Aug 2018, 21:45 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2018, 20:37 PMIncendiaryRounds If Brits are getting snares, I think the AEC should be a lot less potent or removed altogether. Light vehicles would be obsolete vs Brits now. So many ways for Brits to kill lights. And the potential of 210mp able to take on tanks single handedly: 2piats + snare. Brit AT power is the best in the game, it just needs a snare. Pak clone, rabid dog AEC won't allow any overextending with axis lights, fast cromwells, stock comets with more armor than a panther, cheap piats that penetrate more than zooks, etc. Now it has a snare. Something needs to give. On the other hand I'm against stock puma for Ost. I'm against faction symmetry. After the AI nerf to all lights, Ost doesn't struggle as much vs lights and has already the neccessary tools, cheaper schrecks, pak lower pop cap, 222 buff. HATE the stormtrooper changes. Just give cheaper Stg like 75-80 munis. Pgrens with ambush doctrine beats the living shit out of mp40 storms. Same price but gets mp44 and sprint and ambush bonus. I'd rather use agrens for mp40 troops. If axis pumas aren't making allied lights obsolete, then inferior AEC will not make make any axis light obsolete with support. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch28 Aug 2018, 19:15 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2018, 18:56 PMChocoboknight88 I feel that Sappers don't need to have Heat Grenades. Reason being a few things It overlaps with Boys AT Infantry Sections for one. They are barely useful already with their Medic and Pyrotechnic upgrades removed. Now we want to give their only saving grace to non-doctrinal Royal Engineers? I get that having no readily available infantry-based snare sucks but giving a snare like that to the British will making them too strong overall. The combo of RE's HEAT + Infantry Section's Gammon Bomb will be devastating. It will also render the Sniper's Critical Shot redundant. Who's going to use the AEC's snare anymore if you have HEAT nades? What becomes of the Firefly's Tulip rockets other than a munitions sink? The British are a faction that makes use of a lot of soft snares. Temporary debuffs. I like the addition of M7 mines for this reason. It's consistent with the faction's original design. It rewards smart placement of those mines and assists Infantry Sections in successfully using Gammon Bombs and PIAT barrages, if they are fast enough. All this without absolutely screwing over any hope the Axis Player has to pull his vehicle away. Though if I'm honest, it would be nice in the stun lasted a few seconds longer. Well, AT IS itself is pretty awful design and its another gimmick, not something reliable. Guards these boys are not. And since UKF was stripped of all its popular gimmicks, no one will mind or miss an unpopular one that was barely useful. Snipers crit shot still got that range advantage and correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it nerfed into temporary effect? Its still only a gimmick, not a reliable ability. Same thing with AEC. Its a gimmick. UKF as a whole was built around these gimmicks and all of them were hard nerfed one way or another into irrelevance, so the less reliant UKF is on remaining gimmicks, the better for the faction overall. Being consistent with factions original design isn't really an argument, given the fact that original design was reliant on not having certain mandatory tools, but having potent gimmicks to replace them and since these gimmicks were made close to useless, I see nothing wrong with pushing them under the rug. Don't mention mines. If mines were sufficient solution for anything, OKW wouldn't get fausts. In: Lobby
Thread: Flame Hetzer28 Aug 2018, 15:51 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2018, 14:09 PMLago https://community.companyofheroes.com/discussion/244493/december-commander-revamp-changlog Flame Hetzer "Due to the unit's fixed turret and low maneuverability, we found it to be highly situational, struggled on close quarters maps and generally under performed for its price." Cost from 280/100 to 300/90 Population from 12 to 10 Health from 580 to 640 Direct damage from 10 to 9 Range from 32 to 35 Minimum range removed Burst duration from 1.5/2 to 4 Veterancy 1 burst duration changed to -15% cooldown Veterancy 3 cooldown from -30% to -15% Now deployed from Schwerer Panzer Headquarters +it now gets MG upgrade on top of it all. Ullumulu, you could at least play the faction you are fanboying for. I understand that you're in utter denial and extremely ignorant about allied factions, but your own baby? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Hetzer28 Aug 2018, 12:53 PM And you never played a game at a level that could be called competitive. Noobs will struggle with anything, no matter how underpowered it is, you're the best example thinking current croc is strong or hetzer is weak. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Hetzer28 Aug 2018, 11:58 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2018, 11:34 AMullumulu Bro...i quotet this guy because he wantet to tell us that the hetzer is the OP version from the Croc! WTF...must be dumb or never played croc Unless you're on some hard drugs, even wasp is op compared to current croc iteration. Being in complete and utter denial does not change that fact. Croc is terribly bad unit for its price and role, unless for some weird reason you try to counter it with infantry based AT, in which case, the cros is still poor, but in addition you're a noob for not knowing what to use to counter it efficiently. Hetzer performs very well for its cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch28 Aug 2018, 11:56 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2018, 11:54 AMCrecer13 You will not see me in discussions about updating commanders - because I do not see the point in this. All these updated commanders are a mix of the old, the new commanders are likely to be the same mix of the old. If there was a possibility of a really new one, I would be in the forefront of the discussion. I have already proposed a new VDV commander, and I have a lot of ideas about other commanders, I think for so many months there was a real opportunity to make new commanders. You might have not noticed, but that is EXACTLY what was going to happen since day 1 it was announced. Revamp of some old commanders by changing balance and ability reshuffling and some new commanders made using all existing abilities, including campaign/TOW abilities. There will not be anything new. In: Lobby