Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Is there no replay on coh2org of 2v2 ann classic ?27 Nov 2018, 09:29 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2018, 09:04 AMullumulu But..are there any recorded cast out there? its much more entainment to see a great cast than to see the only the record game file!? Relic channel clips? In: Lobby
Thread: AC 2v2 statistics (Wildcard, QT1, QT2, Finals)27 Nov 2018, 09:05 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2018, 03:03 AMmurky depths Despite Siphon's efforts, and his own warning early in the thread, people still (and will always) jump to whatever conclusion they wanted to in the first place. Because numbers r hrd and rarely anyone can interpret them or even knows how and when should they be interpreted. I have also explained why these numbers are moot, it has fallen on deaf ears as some peoples have tinfoil hats too tight. In: Lobby
Thread: Inconsistencies in veterancy bonus26 Nov 2018, 21:46 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2018, 21:12 PMcomm_ash This is an interesting question. Should all units have similar percentages of strength gain with veterancy? Should more expensive units get better vet, or by simply having higher stats out the gate, be more benefitted by having the same vet bonuses as weaker units? What about across factions, should vet be applied based purely on unit cost and role, or be tweaked to help individual factions with different niches? These are all questions that come down to game design. As the game is currently, vet bonuses have nothing to do with balance based on cost, but more to do with a unit's role, faction flavor, and overall faction strength. Medium tanks are the best example of this. All factions have medium tanks, but the vet varies drastically based on the factions. Axis armor gains defensive bonuses though armor at vet 2, whereas Allied armor gains offensive bonuses through DPS. TLDR: Looking at vet balance based purely on unit cost or numbers is the wrong way at conceptualizing it. Unit vet is more broadly related to faction flavor, unit role, and faction relative strength. For infantry the increase in stats is almost always ~70% with a couple of units being exceptions. For vehicles its not really so easy to estimate, P4 bonuses steamroll over T34 bonuses so hard its not funny for example, from vet ability to the stats. In: Lobby
Thread: AC 2v2 statistics (Wildcard, QT1, QT2, Finals)26 Nov 2018, 14:03 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2018, 13:54 PMSmartie Number of soviet games is 157 after all qualification tournaments and 55% of the games were won, pls compare that to win percentage of the axis factions: Highest win rate is 48% with Wehr / OKW. Second best win rate belongs to Brits / Soviets. Its pretty clear that Soviets are the most powerful faction atm, some adjustments are needed to tone down over performing units like the T-70/Guards/SU-85. I dont speak about massive changes but smaller ones like the changes to the Brummbaer. I would also like to see higher CP requirements for Guards: Its ridiculous that a 6 men quad who can fight all types of enemy units comes earlier than US Airborne or OKW Falls (4 men unit!). I hope we see some general balance changes together with the revamp commander patch. 45-55% win ratio is considered balanced actually IF PLAYERS ARE OF EQUAL SKILL, which most certainly was NOT the case if you actually watched the games. You will never have perfect 50% win rate without massive sample sizes. And sample size lower then 100 will not be even close to accurate, too few players, too few match ups and too wide skill gap. Smaller sample sizes can be indicative of 1v1 games, but not of team games, its just meaningless tournament stats, unless some combination of factions scores 70%+ wins, then you can start talking about imbalance. What is needed are USF and UKF buffs to help them in 1s. In: Lobby
Thread: Stug26 Nov 2018, 12:40 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2018, 12:36 PMWiderstreit Thats not true. I am not at home to check that. But Faust bounces 50/50 at Comet and IS2 without effect. 5 month ago it wasn't changed. Define "without effect". Because it not causing engine damage is perfectly normal as long as units have more then 75% health AFTER the hit. 1 penetrating shot + 1-2 fausts will always snare these two. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stug26 Nov 2018, 12:31 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2018, 12:20 PMWiderstreit Since when? About 4 years now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog26 Nov 2018, 12:14 PM Include. Not specifically mentioned it. You know, reread it agains and you will notice there is a plural there. "other factions" as in, more then one specifically nitpicked. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog26 Nov 2018, 12:07 PM Are you nitpicking again? I don't see costs for USF and soviets there. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog26 Nov 2018, 11:19 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2018, 11:11 AMVipper Is that an actual claim that Ostheer have an advantage of other factions due to their tech tree or is it simply the usual rant everything Axis is OP everything Allied is UP? The "the other side get all the freebies" claim is simply wrong and misleading, Ostheer do not get "free" officer USF does, Ostheer simply do not get "all the freebies". Well, there is an undeniable resource difference between ost getting to T3(and getting all weapon and nade/faust abilities for free in the process) and other factions getting to their med tank tech + weapon upgrades + nades. There is resource advantage for both axis factions in that regard if you do the math. Healing is a side cost for all factions, so that doesn't count. In: Lobby
Thread: Inconsistencies in veterancy bonus26 Nov 2018, 10:56 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2018, 10:48 AMElSlayer According to https://www.coh2.org/news/81260/gcs2-game-stats-with-siphon-x#sov_meta they are most used unit and Cons-heavy build orders correlate with higher win percentage. Ppsh docs? There is nothing wrong with them when used with Ppsh. Its when they do not use it when they are pos. There is a reason why Guard Rifle Combined Arms Tactic is most used doc and cons see the use with it. In: Lobby