Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: I think the comet tank is due for a buff.1 Feb 2019, 13:16 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Feb 2019, 12:55 PMSupremeStefan Comet vet sux hard its true maybe he need some penetration buff when he vet up It is the only medium+ tank in the whole game which doesn't get reload bonus. It has THE worst vet out of all vehicles in coh2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind31 Jan 2019, 23:18 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Jan 2019, 23:02 PMShadowLinkX37 ostwind is 90 no? 100 last time I've checked. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility30 Jan 2019, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2019, 10:11 AMLago Ost T1 costs, what, 100 MP 10 FU? It's one of the cheapest structures in the game. If you meant Ost T2, that's light vehicle tech. The issue is a Penal build pays 10 FU, and a Conscript build pays between 35 and 55. That really is irrelevant... The unit does not perform well and does not scale, this is why people don't build cons. If penals had all these upgrades and cons started with molos and AT nades unlocked, people would STILL go for penals only, because penals can actually fight. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pathfinders need a nerf don't they?30 Jan 2019, 08:19 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2019, 22:50 PMShadowLinkX37 I hear BARs on them are quite good, even potentially requiring a nerf, but I use them without the BARs and the damage they deal is largely mediocre. I think it'd be good if we had some tests done with paths both with and without BARs to see if that needs changing as well. I'm quite positive that 120 weapon muni investment will be quite good on any single squad in game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility30 Jan 2019, 08:18 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2019, 03:04 AMthedarkarmadillo They don't NEED a weapon to scale, but they need some attention to. It could be small things with each tier that improve them, make them cheaper, improve their abilities. Make them attractive and remain unique. The Their doctrinal abilities are fine where they are. Their stock abilities, outside of oorah being nerfed hard(doubled the cost) are also ok. AT nades are fine, molos are just bad, vet2 bonus makes them better, but by that time there are weapon upgrades on field, making the bonus throw speed not that relevant. To be honest, I can see no other choice but either T3/T4 stock weapon upgrade or a price cut up to 30 mp(10 will do nothing and everyone knows it, it needs to be significant enough to make a difference in field presence). There is hardly anything unique about the squad, except for the fact that they are "doctrinal stock infantry" and why? Because unless you go specific ppsh doctrine, they are unusable and people tried and tried hard, failed each time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pathfinders need a nerf don't they?29 Jan 2019, 20:47 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2019, 15:48 PMIncendiaryRounds But they get even more sight than pios at vet 1. And pios are hardly capable fighting units. Avoiding mgs and being able to fight at long range reduces bleed which offsets high reinforcement. I don't think I'd change any raw stats but the extra sight at vet 1 should be moved to vet 2, or grant a larger sight boost at vet 3. You do realize recrewed weapons do not inherit vet of a squad that captured them? And out of 4 engineer units, 2 can fight and pios are one of them(excluding sturmpios and assault engies as they are their own tier). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility29 Jan 2019, 20:45 PM Its not molos and at nades that make people go for T1..... Its maxim and conscripts being weak beyond shit tier themselves.... To fix a problem you need to identify it properly first, which you have failed to despite it being highlighted for....... 3 years now? 4? As long as conscripts will NOT scale into the late game as COMBAT UNIT it will NOT BE USED. You can't kill anything with "utility", you do it with weapons, preferably upgraded for late game combat, which cons aren't allowed to have. Give conscripts useful weapon upgrade, even locked behind late tier side tech and you'll see them in almost every single game, I can guarantee you that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Favourite kind of teammates29 Jan 2019, 12:11 PM I like all random team mates, because every single time I forget why I don't play RT, they are always rushing in droves to remind me all the reasons. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pathfinders need a nerf don't they?29 Jan 2019, 10:57 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2019, 10:26 AMblvckdream I´d say make the ability start on cool down like Osttruppen and increase the cool down time so you can´t just open up with Pathfinders only seems enough. It´s actually hilarious that the mighty mighty Osttruppen start on cool down for balance reasons while Pathfinders don´t. I can't see why that would be needed. Paths can't be spammed due to cost, are very bad in combat by themselves, can't take hit therefore have no map presence. You can flood the map with osttruppen and just cap it all, its impossible to do it with paths. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pathfinders need a nerf don't they?29 Jan 2019, 10:03 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2019, 03:09 AMShadowLinkX37 the only thing I don't like about them is how their sight bonuses carry over to recrewed teamweapons. You know how OST bunkers can self spot with MG upgrade and it's an issue? self spotting mobile 50 cals and AT guns ain't exactly super fun to play against either. But ost can do that non doctrinally as pios have extra sight and allow MGs to self spot if you recrew with them. Plus, pathfinders have pretty hefty cost in reinforcement, so contrary to ost, you're actually paying a long term tax for that extra sight. In: COH2 Balance