Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Infantry run over by tank destroyer18 Feb 2015, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2015, 08:59 AMAradan This can all medium/heavy vehicles. This plus SU-76 can drive inf over as the only light. Not like anyone ever would use it anyway. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PGrens with double panzerschrecks against USF17 Feb 2015, 23:29 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Feb 2015, 23:21 PMAlexzandvar Yes they are, pulled straight from the stats website. Regardless it's not even a contest about weather a IS2 can easily kill a Tiger or not. No, they are not. You're looking at single player campaign unit. http://www.coh2-stats.com/vehicles/kv-1_commander_mp This is multiplayer KV-1. Also, feel free to post all the replays where KV-1 beats tigers according to you and last but not least, last time I've checked the tanks had guns mounted on them, so how about you compare these too? On a related note, do you also believe Stuart outclasses P4? Because that is pretty much the relation of KV-1 to tiger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PGrens with double panzerschrecks against USF17 Feb 2015, 23:16 PM You're... 'special' and these are not KV-1 stats. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PGrens with double panzerschrecks against USF17 Feb 2015, 23:01 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2015, 23:01 PMAlexzandvar The idea that you cannot cost effectively deal with Tigers as allies is a joke, not only does the IS2 out class it, so does the KV1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?17 Feb 2015, 22:02 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Feb 2015, 20:05 PMAlexzandvar Wait so how is the inclusion of the Jadgpanther, a unit which Ostheer sorely needs Need? Need against what? Against mediums, you have superior mediums, AT guns, shrecks and stugs if you like them, against heavies you have your own heavies, panther, PaK43 and elephant. Ost doesn't need it at all, because it already got all the hardcounters for all allied armor it needs both doctrinal and stock. And argument "because other armies have 60 range TD" won't go by, because other armies do not have panthers(bar OKW, but they are different can of worms). Ost fills all possible AT niches except extremely light AT akin to PTRS/bazooka. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Visibility on "dead" entities17 Feb 2015, 21:53 PM Congratulations, you have noticed a feature working as intended since alpha. Now you might want to kill casualties. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: The Flakpanzer IV Ostwind gains veterancy 10% faster.17 Feb 2015, 14:04 PM Just like any other bulletin. Play the game, pray for it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks17 Feb 2015, 12:28 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Feb 2015, 12:23 PMJaigen Yeah the thing rifles can defeat volks/obers. So you dont need a sherman . In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What tank is this?17 Feb 2015, 12:12 PM When you see a "statement" that makes your eyebrow rise and believe it to the point of repeating it without trying to check if its true or not yourself-thats stupidity. If you are familiar with the event or know the name of the event, but don't know the details-thats lack of info. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer - MG42 17 Feb 2015, 11:50 AM I love these "but in real life" threads. In real life, M-42 AT gun was extremely efficient in killing tanks from close range on the flank as well as literally sniping infantry. In real life for 1 P4 soviets could make 5-6 T34. In real life tigers and panthers had breakdowns all the time. Should we have the above in game as well? IRL arguments have no place in coh2. In: COH2 Balance