Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: T-34 needs a buff8 Jun 2015, 15:11 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2015, 14:06 PMMediumGray It's timeline spans across a couple of years not just 1944. 1941 soviets with literally THREE 1944 units vs 1944-45 units of three other armies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Loitering JU-87 anti-tank stuka too strong?8 Jun 2015, 15:09 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2015, 14:32 PMBlackKorp Okay to get serious i have to say that this Stuka At strafe is strong, but the point is that i compair it inmmediat with the P47. After you do this it seems no longer to strong. The solution for me would be to nerf both but not just blame the stuka as OP. Comparing it to P47 results in quite obvious over performance of Stuka AT loiter. P47 is completely unable to wreck armor in single pass even if both planes hit, which is extremely rare occuranece. P47 doesn't target infantry and team weapons, killing them just as effectively, stuka does. The stuka have also excellent tracking, it'll get to half HP moving IS-2 in a single pass, show me the same being done by P47. Stuka does what P47 does, except better, cheaper and it does more of it. One thing that P47 have for them is the sight range, but that is it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T-34 needs a buff8 Jun 2015, 11:26 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jun 2015, 23:33 PMbraciszek Cheaper T34/76's Would make sense... And /thread In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson spam8 Jun 2015, 11:26 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2015, 11:09 AMTea Maker Machine Such a powerful thong-destroyer shouldn't be so cheap. What if I told you the fragility and inability to self spot balance that out? Also, we could tell exactly the same abut ele and JT. Also, you present a screenshot of someone who clearly relies on a single unit(which can be seen and confirmed by the army comp) and being punished for it thanks to combined arms force balanced around infantry focusing on AI and armor on AT. There is nothing wrong here except a scrub being countered by someone who does use his brain. PopCap abuse is another issue which the dev don't know how to fix lol. Have fun going at this ad infinitum-its intended design side effect, it won't be fix because: -it can't be fixed -its not broken In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Your average CoH2 player :)6 Jun 2015, 09:52 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2015, 08:15 AMtuvok reminds me of hans gg Come to think of it, thats exactly Hans In: Scrap Yard
Thread: NEXT PATCH announcement3 Jun 2015, 14:00 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2015, 13:55 PMKurtWilde Yeah? But nothing ain't gonna be fixed until we get a decent non - doc tank for the Soviets Well, that won't happen and that tank won't be needed anyway. In: Lobby
Thread: Should OKW get a heavy artillery piece?3 Jun 2015, 13:30 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2015, 13:22 PMGrumpy The "infrared" halftrack is the biggest annoyance. Anyone who knows anything about IR knows that it doesn't see through stuff. Most IR can't even see through glass. The IR in this game is straight out of the back of a comic book, and so are the PAK 43's where the shell phases out of existence to go through the forest and then phases back in to destroy a tank. Because its ARCADE rts, not simulator. Its closer to command & conquer series then MoW. This functionality allows us to have unique, interesting units without completely breaking immersion. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: NEXT PATCH announcement3 Jun 2015, 13:10 PM I seriously couldn't care less for new faction as long as the patch will contain what I've played for last month. Screw new faction, patch hype! In: Lobby
Thread: Should OKW get a heavy artillery piece?3 Jun 2015, 08:13 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2015, 08:03 AMAlexzandvar Except there is nothing in the rules books that says "No Heavy for USF". You mean except of what devs are saying since WFA alpha, which means nothing except intended design is on the way? This is a common thought trap people get them selves into, just because a faction doesn't have something doesn't mean that faction can't be allowed to have it. Nothing against soviet stock upgrades/panther like tank, USF heavy tanks, OKW arty or normal resource rates, Ost light tanks and stock upgrades being made into doctrinal or side upgrades. That still doesn't mean it will happen. Just because something isn't strictly forbidden doesn't translate to "OMG X CONFIRMED". OKW have no on map arty, because they are designed not to have it. Same with USF heavies. Same with Sov upgrades. Same with Ost light tanks. Not all armies are supposed to have everything. Not hard concept. But as you've said, armies should be able to do similar stuff differently. OKW heavy arty is non doctrinal Stuka. You can deny it, doesn't change the fact that its equally strong as LE.f.h or ML-20 or Priest, except much more precise and non doctrinal, so you're striped from that argument as well. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should OKW get a heavy artillery piece?3 Jun 2015, 06:57 AM Well, bunker spam certainly isn't a reason for it. In: COH2 Gameplay