Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Guard Motor Solution?15 Jun 2015, 12:04 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2015, 09:45 AMCardboard Tank That´s why I wrote about the "2CP" mark on which the 120mm mortar appears. Getting a squad wiped around the 7-10 minute mark causes significantly more trouble than in the lategame, where unvetted infantry is thrown away to get VPs. I believe only ost doesn't have tools that would squadwipe easily at that time. Its not really just 120mm problem. OKW have flak HT that can melt infantry in a seconds, pay less attention for a moment and you have 1 less squad. Sturms on the retreat path also can finish off retreating squad effortlessly. USF can more or less successfully chase with M20, M15(less advised) or greyhound. Soviets have M3s with flamers, demos and 120mm. 120mm have the range advantage here, but its also RNG dependent. In: Lobby
Thread: Guard Motor Solution?15 Jun 2015, 07:29 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2015, 01:15 AMCardboard Tank Soviets have never been stronger than in this patch. Still funny to see the forum clown claim that "all Allied players have left the game". Actually they have been. Just as any other army. Well, to a lesser extend OKW. Ost on the other hand gives flashbacks from release when it comes to their strength, especially against -NDA-. Regular squad wipes on a 2 CP mortar are definitely not the thing to make Coh a competitive game. Because last time I checked this game was about unit preservation. Which does not translate to "my squads should never die, even if a god damn B4 shell drops on their heads" which many players confuse it with. In: Lobby
Thread: T-34 needs a buff14 Jun 2015, 09:55 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2015, 01:41 AMTatatala Ho-ly shit. Just when Alex was getting all chill, and worth reading, a long comes Zyllen, shit poster of the 1st degree. Axis fan bois are the Sith confirmed. When one drops, another takes his place. Always two there are. We should erect a memorial wall for the all the fallen ~~sith lords~~ axis fanboys that have come and gone. Welp, here is to another 6 months of reading shit poster extraordinaire. The lolcake legacy will live on forever within the master and the apprentice. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Guard Motor Solution?14 Jun 2015, 09:52 AM Or, now listen to me oshteerlitz, wait for patch. In: Lobby
Thread: The British are Coming?13 Jun 2015, 12:30 PM Combat engineer scavenge kit. Tank hunter doctrine upgrade. In: Lobby
Thread: T-34 needs a buff12 Jun 2015, 22:54 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 22:16 PMZyllen Actually its a pretty valid excuse. And their is also the issue that the usf has no heavies or 85's or decent AT guns so they need to draw their strength from somewhere else. the t-34 is weaker because it is meant to be weaker. Asymmetrical balance we call that And if you dont agree then convince me why the soviets need a stronger stock medium tank. And just comparing stats with other medium tanks isnt valid. you need to look at the shole faction. And what is your excuse for SU-76? Sorry, but that isn't asymmetrical balance here, thats bullshit argument. If the price of the tank prevents overcoming your opponents much stronger tanks with numbers, then its not asymmetrical balance, its bad balance, no matter how you try to look at it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New KT Meta12 Jun 2015, 19:09 PM Ah, I got it by post 9 In: Lobby
Thread: T-34 needs a buff12 Jun 2015, 18:44 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 16:46 PMElSlayer Depends on tier costs. If it would be something like T1 - 50FU T2 - 50FU T3 - 60FU T4 - 70FU then timing is decreased only for 10 fuel in comparsion to what it is in current patch. It T-34 price would be reduced for 10 fuel to compensate, it would be in great spot. That is waaaaaaaaay too optimistic estimation. Imagine the worst that can happen and substract 10% from it and you'll get more accurate. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What are the "Lessons Learned" from CoH 2?12 Jun 2015, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 12:53 PMEsxile Removing Damage table per units was a bad idea for the balance. I'm not entierly sure, it didn't really made much sense why X infantry was bullet proof but snipers could hit it even on retreat while another while still resilient to bullets seemed to be wet from gas and popping like matches when flamer was near. Removal of damage tables improved infantry combat a lot. Target priority was a bigger concern. Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 12:54 PMTheSleep3r You don't remember panzer elite halftrack do you Wirbelwind also could do it. Churchills could do it with ability. PE G43s and BARs could suppress on the move with the ability. In: Lobby
Thread: Brits when relic? 12 Jun 2015, 12:40 PM Relic releases DLCs: community goes nuts and rages. Relic doesn't releases DLCs: community goes nuts and rages. Must be fun working at relic, though I fully understand them here In: COH2 Gameplay