Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: What I want about T34-85s22 Jun 2015, 14:35 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2015, 14:32 PMMittens Maybe some of those are possible but we never know whats going to happen to sovs. We actually do. Just are not allowed to talk about it. Side note: LOL advanced warfare T34/76 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: "Tech Tree Complete" awards a la Konigstiger22 Jun 2015, 14:20 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2015, 14:04 PMFul4n0 aren´t OKW units prices adjusted to that fuel penalty???? just asking, I´m not sure about it. Why would they? Isn't panther cost an answer in itself? OKW fuel penalty is a limiting factor for armor presence, it doesn't mean you make up for it in cost with other resources. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June22 Jun 2015, 14:16 PM @newvan quote was in relation to penetrating shots. That part about at nade/pfaust functionality wasn't changed at all. Mediums and heavies simply can not be crippled by penetrating shot when they end up with more then 75% hp. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June22 Jun 2015, 14:01 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2015, 13:52 PMHux Wait, do I have this right? I thought Faust will still damage engine on medium/heavy armour as long as the Faust shot itself takes the vehicle's health to less than 75%. That's how I interpreted the change.. someone clarify this for me, please. Yes. It also needs to be penetrating shot. In: Lobby
Thread: "Tech Tree Complete" awards a la Konigstiger22 Jun 2015, 11:46 AM Obviously its not worth it duuh. Most of the time you would be arguing stats. You can not agree with them, but it won't make them any less accurate. In: Lobby
Thread: "Tech Tree Complete" awards a la Konigstiger22 Jun 2015, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2015, 11:32 AMJohnnyB Well the only logic you are able to see is yours, as allways. So we'll just agree to disagree. I see you already are grasping at straws. At the same time I don't see you being able to prove me wrong. In: Lobby
Thread: "Tech Tree Complete" awards a la Konigstiger22 Jun 2015, 10:57 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2015, 10:43 AMJohnnyB The fuel difference is bigger if we are to consider the fuel penalty + lack of caches option. Irrelevant, proven by panther. 175 is 175 and performs like 175, not like 250. 260 is 260 and performs like 260. Penalties limit the armor presence, not its effectiveness. Its superior to IS-2 and tiger and cost reflects it. @Butcher Then get 2 panthers. If the choice isn't obvious to always go for it, it likely means its in good spot. And 1v1 late game is hardly about spreading all your forces as thin as possible. Moreover, your other forces still move as they did before. AT guns can't chase anything and you have (soon) stealth puppchens to protect it effortlessly from any flank and soon even from the TDs positioned in front of it. In: Lobby
Thread: "Tech Tree Complete" awards a la Konigstiger22 Jun 2015, 10:18 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2015, 09:43 AMJohnnyB The nerfing of its armor was good. The maintaining of the exactly same price was bad. It got 50% more dmg then IS-2, incomparably less scatter, more HP, lets not compare penetration. Seems rather wroth the extra 30 fuel for a unit that is much more lethal, more durable, slower and non doctrinal. In: Lobby
Thread: "Tech Tree Complete" awards a la Konigstiger22 Jun 2015, 08:40 AM I don't really think its needed. More sideways expanded tech/upgrades would be better then just plain tier tech. In: Lobby
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor21 Jun 2015, 08:45 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2015, 05:11 AMAlexzandvar Good thing the changes being done to it are not the changes done in the alpha. Only a single one of them didn't make to patch. I still believe it'll be way too cost efficient with below 100 fuel cost. In: COH2 Gameplay