Profile of dasheepeh

Jump back to quoted post16 Jun 2015, 10:36 AMKatitof

Tea Maker Machine I'd LOVE you to show us that cons destroying heavy vehicles, that unkillable 6 man squads you speak off(as mine seem to die pretty quickly to all the LMGs and AA HTs).

Also, which doctrine gives you free medium and heavy tanks? I'd love to try it!

Soviets may be strongest in 1v1, but its not a huge margin-definitely not even close to what some people here want it to make.
Its also not relevant, because everything will change in a coupe of days and we'll have to relearn the game again.

Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2015, 23:45 PMLooney

Sov is imo strongest faction. All strats work while other factions need meta to stay competing.

Flames and LMG's are OP as well imo.

Cons > rifles imo OpieOP

You have to invest so much resources in rifles to keep them viable late game. Losing rifles in late game is suicide, non vet rifles in late game just make you bleed without dealing any dmg.

Edit: right about the meta.

US > strong early, strong mid, weak late game. Docs > rifle company, infantry company.
SOV > strong early, weak mid, strong late game. Docs > shock rifle, guard motor.. Almost all docs work imo.
WERH > weak early, strong mid, strong late. Docs > CAS, lightning, StugE.
OKW > weak early, medium mid, very strong late. Docs > pak 43, FS hmg doc and ostwinds doc.

I think vanilla factions are the best designed and all round stronger them WFA factions.

Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 15:25 PMvan Voort

Your original quote:

In all honesty, a 4v4 rank is nothing, really nothing to brag about. Grab a team of 4 semi decent players and stomp 85% of the games because most of the 4v4 players are low skilled players.

You don't get a rank in 4v4 random by "grabbing a team of a 4 semi-decent players" because it's entirely random who you are with and against

How you manage that governs your skill level at random 4v4 because some people are better at it than others and over time the vagaries of the matchmaking will even out.

So anyone who wants to claim, as people in this thread have, that "4v4 is no skill mode" is full of pudding.



4v4 AT is a different kettle of fish, and a team of competent players can break the top 200 without too much problem because, especially as Axis, the balance is so much in your favour for AT v Randoms that it's mostly a matter of playing 20 or so games with the same people.

That said, it's still a case of who is better at it than others.

Jump back to quoted post29 May 2015, 03:05 AMvan Voort

That's why there are ranks that say some people are better at it than others obviously