Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: new ISG is lol20 Dec 2017, 18:03 PM You can use "." and "," to go frame by frame on youtube. Answer on top. Also damage didn't change IIRC. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [DBP] Known bugs/issues in DBP v2.019 Dec 2017, 17:33 PM If it's the same behaviour to paras, i'll say keep it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Really confused about the December balance patch18 Dec 2017, 18:29 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2017, 17:43 PMSwift This is a public thread, we shouldn't be discussing moderation policy and prison sentences here. We've got a topic to follow here, so let's respect that. "Really confused about the December balance patch" 31 Oct 2017, 12:44 PM OP got his answer on the 2nd post. Gonna close the thread. If someone wants to open a new thread to discuss whatever FOTD whine, you can do so in the respective section (you also have the shoutbox). I appreciate reading to criticism, people bashing relic with facts (see Sturmtigercobra posts), heck i like from time to time looking at creative quality shitposts. Also a reminder: In: COH2 Balance
Thread: December Balance Preview17 Dec 2017, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Dec 2017, 18:14 PMHon3ynuts Its my understanding that holding an mg increases RA by 25%, so thats like 1.25*1.25 = 1.56 RA thats a vet 0 230 mp unit facing 3 vet 3 units with a value of 770 + munitions upgrades. Mg34 is terrible vs brits, but at some point throwing enough resources at an mg should let you win. If a vet 0 mg could stare down multiple units of vet 3 upgraded infantry the game would be so broken, only mgs would ever be built. Mgs don't do much at all vs blobs which is bad, but its not like that mg should ever win that fight Nah, that's only the crew having inherently 1.25 size. When you crew you skipped that part (that's why reinforcing is cheaper when doing so with the original crew). ALL MGs sucks against several late game vet 3 infantry with/without upgrades when running through yellow cover (craters). It's like it's 2015 all over again if we discussed this thing. MG's don't counter blobs on their own, if they don't have anything to screen for them cause they get focus fired. Even if a unit is suppressed, have enough of them and they will kill whatever is in front (suppression is like cutting down to 25% the DPS) In: Lobby
Thread: DBP Compiled Patch Notes v1.0-v2.016 Dec 2017, 01:43 AM I'll give it format from time to time so don't worry if you see edits. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview15 Dec 2017, 18:39 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2017, 05:16 AMIncendiaryRounds Also, I find extremely annoying the fact that if there are two targets in the firing arc and you manage to suppress one squad while the other is trying to get past the cone,and you try to click on the other squad but misclick due to the fact that the squad was moving, the mg packs up. I'm sure everyone has had this infuriating experience and I'd say a good way to change it is to allow a secondary method of target selection for mgs. Borrow the directional tulip shooting mechanic from the Firefly. This will no longer require you to click on a moving squad. Attack command instead of just right click. In case you miss, you will still be shooting whatever is on range. In: Lobby
Thread: BALANCE: OKW Sturmpioneer / Salvage / King Tiger15 Dec 2017, 02:18 AM I'm bailing out of this thread cause while i think OP put enough effort into it so as to not make it a "shitpost" as we usually have, i think there are several miss facts and i don't agree with the point he is trying to make, specially with the recent changes on DBP. Modhat on: @Stuglife and whoever else: there's an edit button, use it. Normal etiquette on any forum to not post 2 consecutive posts. It can happen from time to time but try to not do so as it clutters the thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Vet balance and caches15 Dec 2017, 02:11 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2017, 23:12 PMjagd wölfe This is pretty much BS, actual scarvenge is a joke, 5 fuel such a powercreep LUL. TBH, it's not about the resources but about denying the weapons. I voted for no, because i don't think it's necessary for balance and right now there's no time to test it. What i would rather have (this is from when OKW was reworked) is having the resource conversion on the ~~mechanised~~ truck, but exchanging mp for fuel or munition (instead of swapping each other as it was originally). Thinking a bit about it this is what i'll like: -T3 for OKW is split in 2. Gun upgrade and PIV/PV are locked behind 2/3 of the current price of the tech. Obers n JPIV can arrive earlier. -After 2 trucks have been deployed, mech HQ has access to resource conversion, maybe after getting engineers as a package. You can get T1 + T2 and accelerate your way into T3. I put the 2 truck deployed rule, in order to avoid just rushing mediums with T2 deployed. -25/30mp per min for either: 4f or 8mu. Cost is been thought with more or less a 10min return comparison with a normal cache and the risks involved with it (cost/return, initial inversion + opportunity cost of engineers). This way you still have "pseudo" caches for 1v1 and it doesn't affect the economy of teamgames as it would be like Opel blitz, which only affects the one using it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 14:45 PMMr.Smith ... Unrelated note: what's the supposed damage the new Jackson with HVAP should be doing. 240 or 200? What about pen values? In: Lobby
Thread: USF new Greyhound & Jackson seem really to strong12 Dec 2017, 15:10 PM Couple of post invis. Mod /off Several Greyhound (+3) and an M20 got pwn by a Puma + P2 combo. The Puma only died because it kept scouting the map without sweepers and at 10% health. Hans could basically end the game really soon if he didn't waste popcap + mp on recrewing all the MGs against a basically no rifleman army (4 hmg against 2/3 zook rifles?). Hetzer is just as bad/situational as the KV8 at the moment. He basically played without commander the whole game. Also questionable decision on going for PV when there's no whatsoever high armor threat to deal with. Greyhound cost slightly more than the P2 (mp wise) for lesser AI capabilities and barely higher AT capabilities. It needs to spend munition on top of munition to do something (HMG upgrade and canister). "But the vet5 P2 lost against the vet3 Greyhound!". Yeah because it was at 3/4 HP and got jumped on and RNG was in his favour. About the Jackson, using HVAP AND been vet2, managed to kite a KT which was base rushing a base over open space without any kind of support. Wow. NOW, the only good thing i kinda can take out of this thread is: what's the supposed damage the HVAP is meant to be doing. Mod on: If you have any constructive thing to say besides Allies OP, Axis been nerf they are UP, send a PM and i'll re open the thread. In: COH2 Balance