it would be really interesting that mix the t70 providing scouting for the su85 long range
*looks at SU85's focus sight ability*
I'd would love to see some kind of buff to the su76's maingun. Atm it can only deal dmg to Inf with the barrage ability.
I will simply lol at anyone expecting such a change to a 2 year old general use infantry.
Equally possible are pershing for USF, IS-3 for soviets or ober nerf for OKW.
Thread: su-85 needs attention.5 Aug 2014, 08:18 AM
it would be really interesting that mix the t70 providing scouting for the su85 long range *looks at SU85's focus sight ability* I'd would love to see some kind of buff to the su76's maingun. Atm it can only deal dmg to Inf with the barrage ability. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: American off-map abilities need rework5 Aug 2014, 08:09 AM
Not just the American arty needs rework, but also the okw strikes. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Nice game Vs albus and batex4 Aug 2014, 16:49 PM
Good game. ISU152s, Tigers, a lot of Osttruppen and a very close victory. In: Replays |
Thread: Infiltration grenades working as intended?4 Aug 2014, 09:04 AM
That's like saying howitzers should only cost 200 mp, because they are gated by commanders and can only shoot every 90 secs. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Infiltration grenades working as intended?4 Aug 2014, 07:48 AM
I can agree with a munitions increase to 20 Munitions since the OKW have shed their 66% munitions income debuff. *bumps head on desk* Okw gets 100% ammo for a couple of patches. The fact is, those grenades are by far to good for just 10 ammo. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Reasons to build Soviet T4?3 Aug 2014, 14:52 PM
Don't, never go T4, t4 = you lose. had a 2v2 today. i went t4. My vet 3 katyusha had +50 kills. My su85 was vet3 too. But yea, you are right i lost. Because my mate went afk for the rest of the game. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Faction Imbalance2 Aug 2014, 22:05 PM
The problem isn't as exaggerated as it seems. Thank you, you saved me the work of explaining this a 3rd time ![]() In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: su-85 needs attention.2 Aug 2014, 13:25 PM
While swapping SU76 and T70 seems like a good idea. The question is will Relic do it? I can't see Relic swapping them in the near future although they swapped Tiger Ace for King Tiger in COH1 before. No. Relic would rather give the Su76 100% more damage and 100% more AoE. Then there will be 20 rage threads about how OP it became and a week later they will nerf the Damage back to normal and increase the price to 100 fuel. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: su-85 needs attention.2 Aug 2014, 08:42 AM
Su85 is not that much worse than the m36. M36: Hitpoints: 480.0 Armor: 130.0 Rear armor: 60.0 Max speed: 6.5 Pop: 14.0 Cost time: 90.0 Cost manpower: 350.0 Cost fuel: 125.0 Accuracy far: 0.035 Accuracy near: 0.05 Penetration: 200.0/180.0/160.0 Damage: 240 Average Reload time. 5.5 secs DPS: 43 SU85: Hitpoints: 640.0 Armor: 140.0 Rear armor: 70.0 Max speed: 5.7 Pop: 12.0 Cost time: 50.0 Cost manpower: 340.0 Cost fuel: 120.0 Accuracy far: 0.025 Accuracy near: 0.05 Penetration: 200.0/190.0/180.0 Damage: 160 Average Reload Time: 4 secs DPS: 40 In my opinion the only real downside of the SU85 is the lack of the turret. Overall the the DP/S is almost the same, the Jackson just trades Health for mobility. Keep in mind that the m36, due to its low HP, gets knocked out by a single german Teller Mine. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Which is the best playstyle in this badly optimized game1 Aug 2014, 14:46 PM
weird, runs fine on high settings on my one year old 500 euro pc. In: COH2 Gameplay |
|
|
|
9 |
cblanco ★
보드카 중대
VonManteuffel
Heartless Jäger
Germany