Profile of Sturmpanther

Avatar Area

Offline Germany
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 37

General Information
Register Time: 17 Jun 2013, 15:24 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/soe_sturmpanther
Steam: 76561198046481660
Residence:

Germany
Nationality:

Germany
Timezone: Europe/Berlin
Game Name: SoE-Sturmpanther

Show Latest Posts


Thread: c.b vs soe3 Nov 2017, 20:39 PM GG i had fun in your 1vs1 left side Guard In: Replays
Thread: DBP Commander Rework3 Nov 2017, 17:54 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 17:50 PM__deleted__ NKVD doesnt fit together at all so just compare abilities Tank Hunter Tactics are better IMO a) those lil mines combined with normla mine serve as a cheap 40 munny demo b) PTRS cons are a force to be recognised with c) bombing run is very good against both tanks and infantry d) thanks to "random" wreck values salvage is very strong in teamgames e) yes, nades suck Conscript Tactics. Lets start with a fact that current vet3 cons with ppsh will beat always vet3 grens and volks if the axis squad is at least in green cover (so not in garrison), might be vet3(5) with upgrades. Cons can hoorah through any cover and still win the engangement, thanks to 3 ppsh and rediculous recieved acc buffs. So ppsh and rapid conscription abilities are great and synergize well. Incing barrage might be weaker but it is more relialbe becuase it targets what you want. Also costs less and come faster - great against pak walls. Conscript repair kit is great for t34/76 and cons hordes hit the dirt is shit. If reverse army wasnt better I think some people would play conscript tactics because ppsh cons are currently very strong if vet properly hm when people tried to use the airstike it always missed... One last thing: YOu saw that ppsh on cons got nerfed rigth? But i want to stop here. Because we are going to be OFFTOPIC: Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 17:08 PMvasa1719 Tbh i have no idea why we are talking still. There was an option, where you can put your Commander in it. So use it and write NKVD. In: Lobby
Thread: DBP Commander Rework3 Nov 2017, 16:59 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 16:48 PM__deleted__ If you show me that there are worse Soviet commanders than NKVD I will cut my arm. * Conscript Support Tactics * Tank Hunter Tactics At all NKVD has better abilites.( ofc super heavy muni drain. But all single abilities are good And don't cut your arm! In: Lobby
Thread: DBP Commander Rework3 Nov 2017, 16:44 PM Yes and no. Ofc NKVD is def. not the best doc. But i think their are worser docs out for soviets. And as Mr.Smith already said: The patch was not going for: Rework the whole docs at all. This is an existing commander revamp; not a new-and-shiny commander introduction patch. So let's see how many commanders Relic allows to change. In: Lobby
Thread: DBP Commander Rework3 Nov 2017, 16:26 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 16:25 PMDakkaIsMagic Why the fuck was the NKVD commander not on there? I feel like Im the only one who seriously uses it but its complete shit and mun heavy, heavily half-assed too. Nope, other peole use it in 1vs1, 2vs2 as well. In: Lobby
Thread: Some questions for relic/community3 Nov 2017, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 14:39 PMIntelligence209 That was actually hilarious. tho I gave up last night on trying to find what should be a simple answer. Myself and I’m sure others will take note on how this thread played out. Thanks for the reply as well as everyone else Nice to see that some people did not lost their Humor I was not sure, how you will react to my response. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: DBP Commander Rework3 Nov 2017, 15:03 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 14:34 PMMr.Smith This guy gets it. Though, I'd augment that that a faction needs enough commanders to cover all desired roles. For instance, the powerhouse commander in live game is Lightning War. It's OK if OST gets a commander that also covers a more defense-oriented style too. For Brits, Artillery would have been the obvious rework, but Brits already have good camping commanders. Are you referring to the survey link? I can't see either Mechanized Assault or Festung Support as options in the survey. I would have also liked to choose bothof them (which would have also fixed Mechanized Infantry). Mechanized Assault might completely vanish from meta due to T3/T4 changes. I think he used: other option and wrote it down self in the survey In: Lobby
Thread: Please add these two things to the patch mod3 Nov 2017, 15:02 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 14:40 PM__deleted__ Also remove pfussy minimum range pfussy? = panzerfüssis? In: Lobby
Thread: Please add these two things to the patch mod3 Nov 2017, 14:00 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 13:43 PMincognito 1) Rifle nade is free with vet. All rifle AT snares require minimal range. . Wehrmacht has free faust as well( when you built your t1, which you normaly do) and so on ... In: Lobby
Thread: 2v2 Map Contest Tournament3 Nov 2017, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2017, 08:33 AM\|GB\| The Hooligan486 Note that the date of the semi finals and up is changed to sunday guys! LUL since when?^^ In: News