Profile of Basilone

This word cancerous has really gotten out of control. MG play is now "Cancer" LOL.

LOL ikr. Without direction crew guns like MGs and ATGs what is the point of even playing COH2?!? If you just want an infantry and vehicles moshpit, Total War is so much better in that respect.

Now when I launch game the screen goes black after title screen. Validated files on steam, still doesn't work.

If you've been playing COH2 since release and you cannot break in to the top 200 with at least 2 factions, see yourself out. If your posts:games ratio is above 2, also gtfo.

lol i love how to counter anti-BF1 dudes, you just had to bring up how shitty CoH2 is. its borderline obsessive compulsive disorder.

and also DICE is bigger now. if they focused on making actually deep tactical/strategical game instead of punching out all these pretty little insignificant gadgets...

Didn't say it was "shit" but its obviously not what it could have been. If the macro level strategy had more focus on player choices instead of shelling out cash the game would be objectively much better. And yes it is ironic to see people bitching and moaning about "new Battlefields this new Battlefields that" when this is a forum dedicated to a franchise that fell pretty far from grace itself. Not shit, but being slightly better than average is a let down for a sequel to the highest rated game in the genre. If French people are mad that French isn't included, fine. But complaining that the game isn't Verdun on Frostbite engine is retarded.

After checking your playercard its kinda pathetic that you constantly come to COH2s defense whenever I say something remotely negative about it. Most of the things I've complained about impact 1v1 the most (2v2 to a smaller degree), and as a mainly 3v3 player w/ only a dozen 1v1 games played, you aren't really qualified to comment. 3v3 and 4v4 is an imbalanced spammy clusterfuck in BOTH games, you happy?

Funny to see so much "herp derp shit gaem" on a site dedicated to one of the most disappointing games of all time given its potential. You don't like BF? Fine. But nothing about it looks shit even if plays just like a WW2 game with WW1 gear. Games that look shit so far would be DOW3 or COD: IW. Even BF4 which did many things worse than BF3 and BC2 still wasn't a terrible game. You people act like since its a WW1 game that doesn't play like genuine WW1 that its a bad game which is non-sense. That is like saying COD4 is a terrible game because the multiplayer doesn't play like authentic asymmetrical counter terrorism. Lastly to all you guys sayiing Verdun is a unique game that boldly tried to recreate WW1, you're wrong. The game is like Mamayev Kurgan from RO2. Not saying its a bad game, but not truly innovative either.