Profile of JulianSnow

Avatar Area

Offline Netherlands
Posts: 321

General Information
Register Time: 21 Sep 2018, 10:03 AM
Last Visit Time: 13 Apr 2022, 12:03 PM
Steam: 76561198029139134
Birthday: 1991-09-08
Residence:

Netherlands
Nationality:

Netherlands
Timezone: Europe/Amsterdam
Game Name: JulianSnow

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Aircraft spawn distance normalization.23 Dec 2020, 10:48 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2020, 19:33 PMMr. Someguy Wouldn't this mess with AA-units pen & damage values? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Spec Ops Doctrine (especially Radio Silence)23 Dec 2020, 10:12 AM Could radio silence become sector dependant? (Like the sector artillery) That would make it way more specific on the map and both players could get that sector lit up on the minimap. That way your opponent knows that he can't see your units inside that specific sector. Easiest and smallest change to the flares would be to tie the ability to the OKW vehicles (or just the search light unit, posibly making the unit usefull). Should be a bit cheaper tho, 40 (+/-). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Aircraft spawn distance normalization.22 Dec 2020, 13:55 PM I don't think you can standardize this as the arrival of the plane is really map-dependant. A few patches ago the wehrmacht frag bombs for adjusted a little so it doesnt instantly drop at the edge of the map, but thats about it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback21 Dec 2020, 12:56 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2020, 11:04 AMVipper I am not sure if merging with 1.25 target will be worth. I would test having an upgrade at PB3 that change there target size to 1 and adds merge. Well, that'll still let them keep their early game strength. Which was the main issue here, wasn't it? Reduced target size could indeed be added to the BP3 upgrade, but I would still swap the merge and the Pfaust ability. I'm not convinced that changing their timing or cost with only a few seconds or manpower(s)(?) will do much to their performance on the field and their performance on the field seems to be more of an issue than the actual timing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback21 Dec 2020, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 20:41 PMmiragefla If you have other ideas, you can write them in response in this topic. I voted for the HQ build thingy, but got another idea about them.. What about; - Buildable from HQ at 0cp with the cooldown as it is now as buildtime (20sec?) - remove default Pfaust - add merge ability - remove the LMG upgrade This would benefit the feel of the 'relief infantry' ability as that ability was meant to replace suffered losses. Removing the default faust would make that any mechnised vehicle will be their counter in the early game, the merge ability would make up for that as you can keep your team weapons longer on the field. Instead of giving them an LMG upgrade at BP3 i'd give them back the Pfaust (or a riflenade ability), this would support the late game use of the unit. This increases the need of a regular grenadier and the BP3 upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts Ppsh assault package - Late game idea21 Dec 2020, 07:50 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2020, 14:52 PMCrecer13 PPSh-41 should not be a doctrinal upgrade, it should be an alternative upgrade for the 7th person. Also, to be an "assault package" when purchasing a PPSh-41, Molotov must be replaced with RGD-33 / RG-42. DP-27 replaces the PPSh-41 in commanding ability. +1 exactly this. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Crew Members16 Dec 2020, 09:58 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Dec 2020, 07:14 AMKiwiBirb Another change might be making it so that they can only repair to a certain percent, say 75%, and after that REs need to finish the repairs, so that USF can't repair all its vehicles to 100% at once. +1 With this we could enhance the armor company's (iirc) "veteran crew", which in turn could be the only one to repair the tanks to 100%? Just a thought. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion14 Dec 2020, 13:40 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2020, 20:37 PMVipper Pathfinder have a number of issues (weapons with contradicting DPS curves, Low XP value) and should be looked at some point. Giving the pathfinders a weapon upgrade for their own Carbine Rifles (+1 scope or just better stats) which requires no weapon slot and in turn remove all their weapon slots. To keep them as a long range unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Commander: Infiltration and Liberatio8 Dec 2020, 08:19 AM I guess it could be balanced, but 1 B4 commander really is enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Railway Artillery7 Dec 2020, 13:22 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2020, 12:39 PMVipper The ability is comparable to both 240mm, concentrate fire operation. Note that both abilities provide more shells. 6 compared to 3 from the wehrmacht, right? In: COH2 Gameplay