Imagine a lightning war/or blitzkrieg(well maybe not) commander with ass grenadier in place of the G43. people would be using ass grenadier more. Its that the rest of the commander isnt that great to begin with
What are you talking about you get a Tiger with Mech Assault, that alone makes it worth it. Frankly any doctrine with a Tiger with worth it since it isn't like Wehrmacht lacks something in its normal tech tree. |
Centaur, AI Sherman, M8A1, T70, T34(apparently generalist but wrecks infantry and mostly trash against armor instead of being fine at both).
All of which are squishy tanks and get easily blown to hell in short order by the multitude of AT available to OST. I'd have given you some credit if you'd have mentioned the Churchill. |
Ost is the only faction that's allowed to have a functional machine gun, might as well be the only one allowed to have a non-doc functional AI tank. |
Allied nations do require a higher level of skill to play on par with the Axis factions. Ost is generally defensive and it's easy for anyone to set up a defence compared to how hard to is to orchestrate a full on attack.
I think I've seen you in games too.
tbh I think it's L2P for you.
Allied play styles are much different to Axis, I main USF and I feel i do very well, but I lose heavily when I play ost because I keep trying to flank and smoke things. Most Ost units favour sitting at long range and battering the enemy from there. I know from playing USF how much an allied players mouth will water if you come up close with a panther (although I still cant break the habit of flanking/charging with them)
Basially Axis powers generally require less micro to pull off, so when you say other Axis units consistently outperform allied units, they will, if you play allies with no more micro than you do with Axis.
Although, Mg42 insta suppress should be nerfed to the second burst, or the time taken for suppression to wear off should be reduced. Alot of times my riflemen clip an MG42 (with one model), one burst suppresses them and it takes so long to wear off they loose a close range fight with some grens even though the MG did basically nothing.
Well I've got a couple freinds I never give them props for winning as OST because that isn't really a great feat. I always tell them you'll get credit if you win with a faction with a fked up tech tree like USF or a hamstrung one like that was completely nerfed to hell like UKF. Winning as those guys takes some skill. OST is such a babied faction. USF can't have panic call ins like the M10, so we nerf it but OST callins for some reason aren't a problem so yeah go ahead and keep your panic Pumas and command panzer 4s. The .50 cal has too much supression so we'll nerf it, oh but the MG42 can keep its supression, that's totally fine. Its such a joke. |
It’s almost like the most complete factions are the best ones I don’t see any top players complaining about how riflemen are too weak.
So now you're admitting OST is better than USF and UKF. Good, we're making progress, that's basically what I've been trying to say this whole time. Now lets ask why? Because OST is more complete? Yes, also because they've never gotten any hard nerfs to any of their key units unlike every other faction. No MG42 nerf, no mortar nerf, no OP grenade nerf, none of that. |
Being only slightly better than the worst is no way to go through life.
It doesn't matter how good or bad you think I am just look at the GCS2 matches yourself. Most of those were OST vs Soviets, and that's not because USF or Brits were such awesome, balanced factions. |
So you call it as you see it at rank 1000 and then complain on the forums and are countered by people who are most likely better than you. That’s a legitiment arguement.
People laugh because you refute their arguements which come from players with higher ranks, more games, more skill, more experience.
Want help on what you’re doing wrong? Ask for it.
Yeah and which factions did those high ranked players pick during this last GCS2? Pretty sure it was mostly OST and Soviets with the occasional USF and OKW. |
So subject to cognitive bias and your poor gameplay.
To a certain extent maybe. But no more biased and no more based on poor gameplay than the crying from those calling for Brits to beaten with the nerf hammer over the last couple of years except that those people got what they wanted. |
So you admit that your opinions are just based on your biased interpretation and not on statistics, in game values or others experiences.
Well they're based primarily on playing the game I'd say. |
People, CODGUY is a laughing stock on the Steam forums due to him posting similiar ''discussion'' threads on the forum. Everyone debunks his arguments(which aren't even arguments as he never tests or validates his claims) and yet he continues to rant about how 75% of the playerbase are axis mains without any form of evidence.
Please don't take his delusional mindset seriously.
Oh please. All I do is call it like I see it and if you or some people on the Steam forums don't see it that way then fine, whatever. |