Profile of WhiteFlash

Molenweg: I would advise improving the atmospheric settings so it doesnt looks as homogenous. Interesting games on it. Havent done a deep dive on it otherwise. GJ Rickie.

Bocage: Does feel like Crossing in the Swamp as someone casting pointed out. It also had interesting games on it. I would echo AEs observations on this map. Good technical changes got in before the tourny which helped it I would guess, GJ Kpen.

Ploiesti: I will be overhauling this and plan to have a V3 completed by this or next weeks end. I am confident that the fundamental concept of this design is very strong. The feedback and replays have been helpful, thanks all!

Amily Fields: Ive said for months this map should be in automatch. My hope is there will be no more resistance to making that happen and replacing a lesser map can happen in the next patch. GJ Wuff. I would echo Luvnests request to tidy up the 1v1 map pool with regards to this map. Sounds like some tidying is on the way.

I would encourage anyone who wants to give future feedback to do it here or in the COH2 Worldbuilders Discord, this discord has been a good platform for mappers and testers to collaborate and communicate, all the maps seen in the tournament were made better from being there.

Either you linked the wrong video (feb is the date), or I'm not getting it. Regardless of what is talked about in the video, that entire paragraph is about them playing your map and providing feedback.

Also this:




I'm just confused as to what saying "check out this video that's 2 months old" has to do with their feedback on the version they played a few days ago is.

Your not getting it, no worries! Feedback absorbed.

Hello Everyone. Let me start by saying thanks to the mapmakers for all the effort into providing us new playgrounds to mess around with in CoH2.

After playing the tourney games today I wanna share my feedback on the maps I played (Mol, Amily, Ploiet). I will mention Bocage tomorrow, though from what I've observed so far is that is seems too large for 1v1.

What all maps lack are meaningful buildings. Buildings have become more and more absent with the recent matches. Mol for example has one next to the VP, which act more as deathtraps to nades as proper garrisons. The window placement and the lack of them also makes them really unattractive for Soviets and USF. On Bocage there is one, but it only covers a strategic point far away from the action, so why even bother.

Ploiet is probably my least favourite map. It feels a bit stretched, with the middle more or less as a container and then the sides quite far away, resulting in long retreat path. The buildings are too bulky and meaningless, offering little strategic options and windows to shoot out of. The base MGs cover and important flaking route in the middle (towards the bush). I am not a fan of VPs acting as cutoffs. The important fuel and munition points could also be moved a bit more towards the center, as they are so far to the edge of the map, stretching 1v1 engagements quite thin. By opening up that corridor behind the buildings and moving the resources point a bit closer to the center aswell as adjusting the VPs to not act as cutoffs this could improve the map.

Not sure how much you have played Ploiesti, please take a look https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJFm4vMdHNc

This makes it better yes? Equal both sides

can i get a replay that illustrates why this is OP? thanks