Profile of murky depths

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 607

General Information
Last Visit Time: 29 Sep 2021, 18:14 PM


Thread: Buff Ostwind13 Nov 2018, 21:34 PM Are you saying that maxim has a higher suppression build up stat than Vickers? Sir, you go too far. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind13 Nov 2018, 21:26 PM I don't think I'd wish the stats of the maxim on the worst of my enemies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I haven't seen a Soviet AT gun in at least six months.13 Nov 2018, 21:15 PM Ah, I see. Now I'm curious to try the SVT Guards rifle squad from lend lease. Though I think they are a bit gimped by normal standards since they get PPSH instead of DPs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind13 Nov 2018, 21:11 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 21:09 PMWiderstreit And Bofors is balanced? The hole unit is everything, but not balanced. On one hand it is OP on the other it is bad. I never said that, personally I think it's a janky emplacement that can sucker-punch in some settings and be a total waste of resources in others. Though apparently it has a bit of an identity issue regarding anti-air. My view is that brits as a whole are a whack faction and are not designed all that well. I don't find bofors an issue when I play as OKW, so I can't really comment on what should be done with it, but I never play as brits so I don't really have a defensive argument for it either. I would defer to the experience of others here. It is like the Vickers, this MG is also not balanced. Way too much DPS and on the other hand useless... IMO all HMGs should be suppression platforms, so I think we agree here. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I haven't seen a Soviet AT gun in at least six months.13 Nov 2018, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 21:03 PMVipper That is incorrect. It use to be bad vs infantry because it had 0.03/0.0425 /0.055 accuracy. Then they relished it was op as hell with new accuracy and the damage was reduce from 40 to 27. I'm having trouble following here -- so they realized it was bad against infantry and nerfed it's AI ability anyway? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind13 Nov 2018, 21:07 PM I no speaka-da-deutsch Anyway, any given unit will have to be balanced for performance, not for what the best possible IRL example of it was. Otherwise the t-34s would all be 85mm versions by default, etc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I have a question13 Nov 2018, 21:03 PM SCHWERER GUSTAV IS PRIMED AND READY In: Lobby
Thread: Buff Ostwind13 Nov 2018, 20:59 PM This source lists that it shot faster but that Bofors was more destructive and had better range: http://military.wikia.com/wiki/3.7_cm_Flak_18/36/37/43 Though none of this matters in the context of game balance since one is a mobile unit and the other an emplacement, which will determine who gets a better gun more than what the reality was. Oh well. IMO, Ostwind could work with a buff that is dependent on its mobility. So make it somewhat similar to the flaktrak in that if it is not moving, it sets up and gains a rate of fire buff, but when moving it retains its current performance. I guess you could go the t-34/85 route too and make a doctrinal upgraded Ostwind. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind13 Nov 2018, 15:28 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2018, 17:31 PMWiderstreit If game would be logical, then Ostwind would have same fire-rate as Bofos has ingame and Bofors has same as Ostwind has currently. Bofors: 120 rounds/min 3,7cm FlaK 43: 250 rounds/min According to panzerworld, the flak 43 shot at 150 rounds/min. https://panzerworld.com/flakpanzer-iv Either way, it should be a bit faster if we were going to stick to realism. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is there anyway to avoid the ZiS gun bug? 13 Nov 2018, 03:20 AM That matches up with my assumption, since it always seems to bug after I barrage. Thx Duffman, guess I'll just have to commit to barrages. In: COH2 Bugs