Profile of ShadowLinkX37

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/ShadowLinkX37


Thread: Vonasten raging Hihihihi5 Jun 2019, 18:02 PM Not gonna lie I was quite disappointed. In: Replays
Thread: Veteran Squad leader upgrade weapon poll5 Jun 2019, 16:18 PM @OP maybe don't call it a sniper rifle/scoped G43. The scoped G43 is what JLI use and it crits models below 75% HP for an instant kill. The standard G43 is a semi automatic rifle designed for mid/close range combat but is also decent at long. The exact opposite of the scoped G43 the JLI use. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M36 Jackson5 Jun 2019, 16:11 PM invised offtopic post In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson5 Jun 2019, 15:20 PM Yeah jacksons are nuts, but USF hasn't received a sizable nerf in what? 2 years? when rifles lost their 1919s and insane RA bonuses. Don't hold your breath. It's all just compensation cause "rifle sucks" (no source) HE sherman bad tank and scott is just useless too. BARs expensive and StG better, pakhowie no range, AT gun bounces, 50 cal awful. I mean the USF lineup is just crying in a corner. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage4 Jun 2019, 20:33 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2019, 20:06 PMLago For the Churchill: I reckon shift 60 armour from the back to the front (300/120), reduce hit points to 800, 0.8 received damage. That gives it 1000 effective hit points and +25% repair speed. That's a seven shot kill from an AT gun, same as the IS-2, Tiger, Croc and AVRE. (The live Churchill is a nine shot kill). Move the smoke shell from the Crocodile to the standard Churchill. The Croc has a flamer: it doesn't need to blind anti-tank guns. The standard Churchill, however, would definitely appreciate it. For the KV-1: Give it the same armour values as the KV-2: 300 frontal, 120 rear. That makes the KV-1 a little better at range, but rewards flanking it. I liked them as well. However this will also cause problems with the JP4/StuG usage because of their low penetration at max range. but those are topics for another thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage4 Jun 2019, 18:27 PM Can we move off the topic of "what is objectivity"? At least reference the fact you're in a thread about the KV-1 and Churchill in your posts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage3 Jun 2019, 22:50 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 22:36 PMSkysTheLimit What is your point here and why is the JT in it? It has greater than 60 range. The point is, everyone cried the JT was OP, received a nerf. Now we have a threads about the Churchill and KV-1 and it’s just L2P as a response. Seems pretty dumb. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage3 Jun 2019, 22:23 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 22:15 PMSkysTheLimit You can also say it has no tech costs. And your question started about the Croc. I mean 50>35. If you spot for them rather than just solo cloak creeping the Churchill still has to drive up to it. But OKW also has jp4. 60>50 though and we still needed a nerf on the KT, JT , brummbar you name it. The Churchill is still cheaper than an OST panther which is just pathetic considering the HP it has and how it’s main gun can actually kill infantry. The point is, no one unit should be OP axis or allied. If you get flanked you should take some damage instead of bouncing shots. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage3 Jun 2019, 21:46 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 20:31 PMWingZero Probably with multiple Stugs with or without smoke, especially late game if there is a croc and a firefly. With OKW, most likely go into JP4 spam into JT if needed. Jp4 spam? In 1v1? Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 20:31 PMLago I'd assume with 930 MP 370 FU worth of stuff. Such as? Try using 50 range raks vs croc... Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 20:35 PMKatitof Contrary to JT, their frontal armor is actually penetrable reliably by most axis AT forms. In other words: Its impossible to kill JT any other way then flank. Also, its not like JT/ele guns struggle to penetrate T34s and shermans and KV-1 and churchill most certainly do not have an easy time against P4s, they have advantage, but its still going to be a long brawl. To kill Churchill/KV-1 you just need to park a Panther in front of it. And for your question, JT/ele would do the job reliably, fast and with complete impunity. Non doc vs doc doesn’t sound very fair. JT costs more than the churchills therefore it should have better armor. Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 20:55 PMSkysTheLimit What does the croc+firefly have to do with this thread? It has normal heavy tank health and 290 armor, it's very different from the Churchill. If you ask the same question about firefly+Churchill, just use AT guns and spot JT has 525 armor. The Churchill has 240. AT guns have far less than a 50% chance frontally on a JT point blank, 80% at max range on a Churchill JT is doctrinal. Churchill and firefly isn’t. How does 50 range at gun work vs 1400 hp and grenades clears? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage3 Jun 2019, 20:26 PM I'd honestly like to hear how the primarily allied players would counter a croc backed by a firefly in 1v1. If the "big and slow" heavy tanks should have high rear armor because of that, shouldn't we buff JT rear armor to like 200? I mean it's the slowest tank in the game right? In: COH2 Balance