Profile of thedarkarmadillo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 5279

General Information


Thread: Brit tank scatter7 Jul 2018, 04:08 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2018, 02:42 AMjbjbjb3743 Not sure... the opponents was definitely playing tho but my point is having multiple Churchills can really deal heavy damage. having mulitple almost any tank will cause alot of damage. being able to fully tech and then build multiple high cost tanks by the 20 min mark means the game was decided when the players were loading in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: King Tiger balance fix: smoke launchers5 Jul 2018, 04:19 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2018, 02:42 AMinsaneHoshi Yes, so why are you expecting them to perform equally? Both are underperforming due to being inconsistent heavy tanks with 375 armour. Tbh they are a pair of very similar tanks (pros and cons both ways) so ESPECIALLY with the inconsistent output from both of them its not out of the realm for them to go hand in hand In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should UKF get one or more of their doctrinal tools non-doc?4 Jul 2018, 17:09 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2018, 12:03 PMswordfisch I said iirc and disagreed with what you said because looking at your original stats you posted they seemed incorrect, and they were as others have pointed out. Anyway there is an easy fix here and it's simply making the bonus not stack. So not really an argument to why UKF shouldn't be allowed a non-doc CQB unit to help with flanks. What about the 210mp panzer green target size up to 5 man and weapon rack ready sappers? Not going to defend against a blob but are better vanguard than anything you will find anywhere near that price point or even above it. I don't see how adding a unit that can cheaply apply vet bonus levels of accuracy and ungodly levels of rec acc (target size of 0.2 for unvetted sappers and Tommy's) as well as sprint non doc is going to do anything but break the game. While we are at it can we get the blob officer and command panzer for the Germans? There's not nearly enough bobbing in gane we need to make sure it's always at its prime without dedicating to a commander. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should UKF get one or more of their doctrinal tools non-doc?3 Jul 2018, 01:29 AM so ALO still makes vanilla unvetted tommies have better rec acc than any vetted unit in the game including obers full stop? thats a hard no on being non doc then because 5 man armmed tommys are plenty is is with "just" panzer gren levels of rec acc In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should UKF get one or more of their doctrinal tools non-doc?30 Jun 2018, 14:37 PM Would the alo retain the - 75% target size and sprint buff that's somehow gone under the radar? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: adjustment for puma30 Jun 2018, 14:33 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2018, 09:24 AMLago You can't simply swap the M10 for the M36 as it doesn't have the firepower needed to fight heavy tanks and USF's other nondoc tank is the 75mm Sherman. So long as USF has only one anti-tank vehicle that vehicle has to be able to deal with every other vehicle in the game. Otherwise the vehicle it can't counter counters USF's entire armour pool. Non vet HVAP. Above average pen on the sherman. That thing the usf doesn't know because their army is built around 2 units that are supposed to counter every other unit with godly effecinecy called combined arms. Hell give it deflection damage if it has to. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: adjustment for puma30 Jun 2018, 06:15 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2018, 03:10 AMFiresparks the current m36 is non contiguous at all. Tank destroyers should have some type of crippling disadvantage to justify its range and hitting power. Stug, su85, and jpz4 are casemate AFV. The Firefly have to deal with slow turret, slow reload(low dps), and slow chassis. The current m36 have no such exploitable weakness. Its used to be fragile but no longer. Instead of boosting the m36's hp, it should have been given smoke, along with a buff to its size, speed and maybe speed. The puma is a good example of how to make a 3 hk afv survivable and the jackson should have been buffed using the puma as a guideline. That hp buff was just about the worst way to buff the m36. I think we're in agreement here. You can't take a glass cannon, remove the glass and call it a day. Imo if they wanted a non doc brawler (as they made) they should have swapped the m10 so there was a unique TD option instead of the very best and a doctrinal downgrade (right now its like having non doc t34-85s and doctrinal 76s...) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: adjustment for puma30 Jun 2018, 02:25 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2018, 23:48 PMFiresparks the m36 USED TO have 480 hp, meaning that it was a 3hk similar to the puma. no longer. The only things it has in common is that they both have all the tools needed to survive being a 3hk while 1 is not, and hits harder, and further away, and self heals, and gets further damage/pen shells with vet. The only remaining similarities are that they are mobile units designed to fight tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: adjustment for puma29 Jun 2018, 00:17 AM The puma is hardly spam viable. It's stop gap AT at best. It's an armored Zook that costs about as much fuel as an su76 or stug with more micro and less punch with less potency vs infantry than either of em... Hardly a problem In: COH2 Balance
Thread: adjustment for puma28 Jun 2018, 19:18 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2018, 12:10 PMullumulu OP was starting this comparing. And puma is a t3 unit when iam play as OKW. M3a3 clown car is t3 unit when I play Soviet pls buff In: COH2 Balance