|
Yeah and the Cromwell's gun is not as good as it seems to be. Try to shoot at the frontal plate of a Pz.IV and count how many times it will ricochet. Yeah, a lot.
The main gun of the Cromwell is by far his speed and mobility, rather than the gun itself. Churchill don't have this, so his gun becomes worse than the Cromwell's one.
It's not really complicated to understand, i swear.  http://www.stat.coh2.hu/weapon.php?filename=panzer_4_75mm_mp
http://www.stat.coh2.hu/squad.php?filename=panzer_iv_squad_mp
"it will ricochet. Yeah, a lot."
"Cromwell's gun is not as good as it seems" |
Yes, only 120 penetration, because Cromwell is a flanking tank with high speed/accleration. Something that does not fit the role of the Churchill very well. So its worse on top of a Churchill chassis.
dude look at what i responded and stop posting he just said Churchill has a worst gun than medium tank |
1 second longer reload, no tank commander that gives +10% accuracy, +10% sight range.
Around ~20% worse.
tank commader is now the gun ? |
Did they ninja buff the katyusha?
Also it is not just brits who give OST a hard time. SU with their durable support teams, free shrecks and 45Muni PPsh can create frustrating moment for OST players.
Actually that is just a meme, or rather an excuse to keep the OP factions dominant and the underdog must remain underdog. "OST is fine don't touch it, I wanna keep smashing them lul" no ost is the best design faction the problem is relic , when they made the new factions they only tried to improve from the existing one so that came up with broken uncounterable faction with almost no draw back |
And canoon that way worse than medium tank gun.
its literally the same as the Cromwell |
Why should we limit churchill to one? It never will be in line with pershing, is-2, kt, etc.
non doc cheap haevy tank with 1600 h and 300 armor |
Sure DO IT! Make the pak43 cost 20 pop cap, 75 fuel, and a HUGE target that anything can hit. Also, remove it's ability to fire through walls and shotblockers and require to use munitions to do that just like the 17 pounder. I don't mind.
Sure add embrace to the okw flak emplacement (I'm assuming it's not the Flak HQ).
Other emplacements don't work this way because they're not reliant on it as UKF is. Does OKW units cost an arm and a leg to build? Does UKF have a mobile sniper arty unit called ISG to replace it's mortar pit? Does it have starting out 5 man mainline infantry with laser rockets? Does UKF have a mobile rocket unit (only if you include it's soon to be 8 cp landmattress)? Does UKF have a super heavy late game called KT? OKW does not need it's emplacements (which are doctrinal) to win. That's why it's not as big of an issue.
Now tell me, if you removed all of UKF's emplacements, how would they counter a fortified position with MGs and ATs? They have no indirect fire now. They also have no rocket artillery. Base howitzers require close range, muni, and is timed. The enemy simply has to relocate a bit.
make it non doc too
|
300 frontal armor, 1600 hp, 185 fuel. Fix bugged anvil ability. ...........CAPPED AT 1 RIGHT ? |
In my opinion, the KV-1 is performing better than the Churchill. I'd rather call a KV-1 on the battlefield than a Churchill, really.
But I agree that both of them need to be adjusted. kv1 to tier 4 with 140 pen
The Churchill can edgier be a heavy tank like AM stayed but need to be capped at 1 on the field or make it cheaper than right now |