Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins17 Oct 2016, 00:12 AM Imo light vehicle could be fixed as follows: 1)Armored cars Reduce DPS to 50%-75% increase penetration so their relative DPS remain the same. Change DPs curve so that that they benefit less from range (tank hmgs also) Reintroduce 221 Remove "point blank" mechanism from this vehicles and from all tanks weapons including hmgs, infantry should maintain cover bonus against vehicles since vehicles can close in fast and lose little by closing in. 2)Light tanks Reduce DPS to about 50%-75% vs infantry (use target tables if necessary) Make 222 a fuel manpower upgrade that also boost armor a bit. Use target tables to reduce damage of certain weapon vs light vehicles like ATGs. 3) delay light tanks a bit and medium tanks Aim of this change is to reduce the shock value of light vehicles vs infantry but increase their use time and ability to survive... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Miragefla's December Balance Mod Additions12 Oct 2016, 17:32 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2016, 14:01 PMMr.Smith ... That's not a bad thing though. Currently, the G43 upgrade for PGrens (and Stormtroopers, when compared to Stormtrooper STG) is a straight downgrade for all ranges. ... Imo the only way a G43 for PG makes sense is if the come at 280-300 price and start with 2 ST44 2 K98. A more interesting solution is to move the G43 upgrade to pioneers taking all weapon slots. Since other factions can use pioneer as frontal line troops I see little reason why Osther should be an exception. In: Modding and Tools
Thread: Why did Panthers seem to work in Coh1 but not in Coh227 Sep 2016, 12:26 PM In coh1 Panther was a Tank in coh2 Panther is hybrid Tank and TD. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The state of balance atm...24 Sep 2016, 18:09 PM Well if one makes player card relevant to balance suggestion than we would have another circle of pointless posts where player A would argue he is right because player B has a lower ladder position. It is actually quite simpler to read, understand and rate a suggestion and not the person making it... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Time to Kill stats20 Sep 2016, 11:01 AM Stug is extremely cost efficient as mentioned but the SU-76 is also. When vetted is poses a serious threat to Heavy tanks... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Miragefla's Highlights Cast19 Sep 2016, 17:17 PM (wrong thread i this should go to mode thread....) Some of my suggestion would be: OKW AAHT: New role since hmg is available take the role of light tank counter. Changes: reduce fuel to 40, remove minimum range, remove suppression, increase hp to 400 increase penetration to 35-50. Number may need tuning. USf Dozer: New role since this unit has little to offer over Sherman turn it to mini KV-2 without the penalties of received accuracy when chancing modes or the vision limits. In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: [OKW] switch FlakHT to MortarHT?19 Sep 2016, 13:37 PM Since OKW now have hmgs, AT HT have less use as a suppression platform. I would consider removing their suppression, minimum range, lower the fuel cost to 40, increase hp to 400 and increase there penetration so that 2 can fight of a light tank. That would help OKW against light vehicles if they go T1 and make the unit useful... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Time to Kill stats18 Sep 2016, 10:07 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2016, 09:07 AMMr.Smith I think that a more appropriate way to interpret the Stug - SU85 disparity is as follows: ... Both stug and Su76 are both extremely cost efficient. The extra 10 range that both Su-85 and SU-75 have make allot of difference since it means that they can fire out of range of heavy tanks. It would be better if DPS was also compared at same range of 50. In addition is real fight penetration is better than ROF for TD that use hit and run tactics. Imo SU-85 is much better now against heavy tanks than it was prepatch with it high ROF and LOW penetration. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British emplacements 17 Sep 2016, 12:33 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2016, 12:17 PMMr.Smith ... Instead, when you are fighting a 17-pounder, all you have to do is strafe from max range. You don't even have to worry about moving accuracy, since the target size (and target box) of the 17-pounder is massive (40 compared to the KT's 26). To top the terribleness of this gun off, this is the only AT gun in the game that can be destroyed by dedicated tank-destroyers. ... I am a little confused. I do not claim that 17p is good but I am pretty sure it will beat stugs or JPs that attack it since it has more range and it can spot them... About the tanks before you said that they would snipe it, now that they circle strafe. At what range? If it further away from 35 they cant see it, if it is weapon range (45 for most tanks) they will be inside the 17p range of 80 so they will be fired upon... Anyway you are missing the point, the argument here is that emplacements should be less of commitment of resources, while they should be less spammable and their effectiveness should have more to do with hammer/anvil choice... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British emplacements 17 Sep 2016, 12:12 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2016, 12:07 PMMr.Smith ... The 17 pdr is useless because it's the only AT gun that can be sniped by other AT guns or tanks from a distance; and also that popcap. Sniped by tanks? it has a range of 80 and flare to spot... In: COH2 Balance