Are you referring to me? Rank 22 2v2 randumb and 0.67 win ratio is considered mediocre these days? We can't all be 3v3 heroes. 
I wasnt calling specific names, but makes sense that you think you were one of the targets.
And funny how "the balance team is biased" is coming from a person who has 99% axis playrate and posts nothing but "waaah axis are UP, allies are OP" since ages. I dont think ranks alone decide about whether a player is good or not, Ive never used "Im rank 1 in that mode so my opinion matters more" type of arguments. Nonetheless, the type of statements a player makes can definitely make them (appear) mediocre.
When someone says that Ostheer has trash infantry and trash lategame nowadays, that just gives me the impression that this person has absolutely no understanding about his own faction and its tools. (buffed tiger, best anti blob weapons in the game, scoped elefant = bad lategame, makes sense.)
And I'm sure the people who still complain about OST infantry are players who never try to adapt and always use the exact same strat (gren spam?) since an eternity. Saying the faction has trash 4-man squads when you have access to 4-minute elite infantry that has amazing base stats, absolutely amazing veterancy and weapon upgrades against pretty much any target (schrecks vs fast vehicles and on maps with a lot shotblockers, G43 on longrange maps) makes 0 sense to me.
If your strategy barely gives you more than 60% winrate or even less, then you are the issue, not game balance. Speaking of 2v2+ ofc, but 5men grens and assault grens didnt seem weak at all in 1v1 so what are people crying about?