Profile of Olekman

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 117

General Information


Thread: [Release] DeCoHde 2.0 (Snake Edition!) WIP [Help needed]6 Apr 2020, 14:28 PM Interesting idea! Others have already pointed out the error in the front/rear armour. I also volunteer for the modding help. I published a couple of small mods in the workshop and I think I have a solid grasp on the Attribute Editor. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: P47 Rocket Strike uses incorrect penetration effect5 Apr 2020, 17:20 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2020, 16:16 PMSkysTheLimit I get much more reliable performance from SCAS both against me and for me. Just seems harder to dodge and less likely to collide with structures Its also 40 munitions cheaper, not that that's a huge difference I also think that Stuka CAS has greater tactical impact, primarily because it forces antitank guns and MGs to either relocate or risk being decrewed. Regular off-map arty also forces them to move, but CAS has bigger area of effect. My mistake, I was thinking about Stuka Stafing Run. Anti-Tank Overwatch fits same role as P-47 Loiter, but it's cheaper and not affected by the map layout. The planes have the added advantage of chasing after locked-on targets outside the loiter area, but also a disadvantage of being vulnerable to AA. Loiter has just barely longer duration time, but much faster cooldown (65 seconds compared to 95 seconds of AT Overwatch). Questions is how they compare in dealing damage when things are set up for them to shine (i.e. a vehicle has damaged engine). From my experience, the Anti-Tank Overwatch is more effective at what it does, but I wonder how other players think. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: USF Airborne Company2 Apr 2020, 06:47 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2020, 06:31 AMKatitof But.... airborne have 2 and I&R have 1... Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2020, 06:42 AMShadowLinkX37 As katitof said, I&Rs have the 1 scoped garand and regular have the 2. 1 scoped garand is superior anyways typically because there aren't usually enough below threshhold models to shoot at. So regular paths kinda get the bad end in both less utility and performance. You guys are correct, my mistake. I mixed up sbps when checking in Attribute Editor. And is it really worse to have 2? Target entities are chosen randomly, no? So if you have 2 scoped Garands in your team, there's a higher chance that either one of them will target the low-health entity. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Company2 Apr 2020, 05:46 AM I'm just surprised that Airborne Pathfinders have 1 scoped rifle, while Recon Pathfinders have 2 despite the fact that they provide additional utility with Artillery Barrage. If anything, it should be the other way around - 2 for regular Pathfinders, 1 for I&R. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Question about 120mm mortar30 Mar 2020, 18:15 PM Other than the changes mentioned before, standardizing its barrage AoE with its autofire AoE would be a good - near/mid/far for autofire is 1,5/3/4,5; for barrage it's 1,1/3,5/4,5. It's probably a remnant from some old slapdash fix by Relic from back when it fired mini-nukes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?30 Mar 2020, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 11:10 AMporkloin Nah. To prove his point that CE aren't effective after losing 90% of the map is to game the matchup by retreat path blobbing around his minesweeper. Seriously though, I think this is a bad way of testing whether your strategy is viable or not. It's better to try it out with people that: a) don't know what you're planning; b) are in your "weight category". What others have said before still holds - CEs are (marginally, but nonetheless) more expensive to reinforce than Conscripts, lack good veterancy bonuses, lack anti-tank snare... Even if you take into account the received accuracy penalty, the Conscripts still have roughly 28% more total health and they lose DPS slower than CEs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Caches for OKW30 Mar 2020, 10:55 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2020, 21:49 PMShadowLinkX37 Agree here. The issue is more every cache effects every team member instead of just the player planting it. From design perspective, instead of being a source of passive income, they should be just a way to exchange manpower for fuel/munitions. This way only the executing player receives the benefits and it doesn't screw up as much with the economy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Demolition charges can be placed near capture points28 Mar 2020, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 20:19 PMelchino7 Not necessarily talking about demo requirements but that certain strategic points have different properties, at least hitbox wise (?). Ex: Munition and fuel points are not able to have sandbags been built on top of them while normal strategic points allow. After a quick look, it doesn't really seem to me like these two are connected in any way. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Demolition charges can be placed near capture points28 Mar 2020, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 19:31 PMelchino7 Might be related to the sandbag near capture point bug? What is that bug exactly? From what I can see in Attribute Editor, there are no restrictions on placing demo charges on strategic points. I'd say that the most likely scenario is that the correct requirement actions were there, but were accidentally removed at some point, but perhaps they are connected. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: General bugs & issues collection28 Mar 2020, 06:48 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2020, 23:38 PMSander93 Would you mind PM'ing me your solution to this so that our modders can have a look at it? Sure! I'll send it over soon. In: COH2 Bugs