Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1218

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: Remember when21 Nov 2014, 11:53 AM I remember times where the Tiger wasn´t a glass cannon. It got an armor increase at vet 2 and had more health. Nowadays it´s going down with 5 hits from a Jackson. I should start a thread about it. It´s the only "Heavy" tank that goes down within seconds. Sure, it devastates infantry, but the Tiger as a glass cannon is quite strange. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What exactly is it?20 Nov 2014, 15:15 PM So people can finally get rid of the OKW biker-gang crosses? In: Lobby
Thread: What if the Jackson was the US heavy unit? 18 Nov 2014, 17:47 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Nov 2014, 16:32 PMBurts The jacksons open turret allowed it to have great vision compared to other tanks, which for some reason IS not reflected in the game... Yeah, like the 60 range SU-85 spotting for itself wasn´t enough. Let´s introduce that to a TD with a turret and better maneuverability. What could possibly go wrong considering balance? I hate StuG and Jackson alike. Going down with three shots (sometimes two) is considerably reducing their attractiveness as mid to late-game options. Both need a health increase. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: This garden moderator needs to pudding go!!13 Nov 2014, 19:07 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 18:58 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ <--- Current gamertag since Cyrillic characters don't work anymore 'Garden this game' Haha, well it´s annoying for non Russians if you can´t communicate with your teammates. English is the "lingua franca" of today. I don´t get why (some) Russians are so stubborn about that. You don´t see me typing German ingame either. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Do you think Grenadier LMG too strong?13 Nov 2014, 11:50 AM I like the LMG upgrade. It´s in a good state and gives Grenadiers the possibility to scale into the late game. In the end this means more choices and a better experience throughout the whole game. If you feel that LMGs should be tuned down in performance, because conscripts for example don´t scale into the late game, then that is a problem with conscripts rather than the Gren LMGs. I don´t want to see Grens lose their utility in longer games. If it´s really a problem, other units that don´t scale into the later stages of the game should be adjusted to have some utility themselves, rather than kicking out Grens (and thus narrowing the viable strategies). In: Lobby
Thread: Just bring us old Stug III! 12 Nov 2014, 22:10 PM It´s only performing somewhat adequate with the doctrinal scopes. In the days of Tiger call in being the choice for competitive gaming, scopes are non existent. The StuG doesn´t excel at anything. It´s - as others have already stated - a cheaper generalist vehicle fulfilling no specific role. The other problem is the health. I´ve had StuGs being tackled by lone T-34/85s that just parked in front of it and won. It´s just three shots. The 50 range is pretty lame too as the gap is closed very fast by tanks pursuing it. So if the StuG is really supposed to be a glass cannon, give it 60 range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just bring us old Stug III! 11 Nov 2014, 20:16 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2014, 19:33 PMKatitof It costs 80 fuel and is most durable vehicle in game for that price. Ostheer doesn´t need a StuG that goes down within seconds. The current StuG can´t compete with anything atm. It has the survivability of a light tank and not even the mobility of a medium. It also lacks a turret and operates in a clumsy manner. It has to turn its hull more often than turreted tanks and thus gets stuck easier. Bad maneuverability + low health = Fuel better spent on a Panzer IV. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just bring us old Stug III! 11 Nov 2014, 17:12 PM StuG could need a buff. I wouldn´t even mind if the cost got increased for that. Right now the 120mp, 35 fuel more are better spent for a turret, 2 free MGs and more health. Su-85s make StuGs obsolete. A Panzer IV has chances though. StuGs also hit the ground/obstacles pretty often since some patches ago. All in all your money is better spent on a Panzer IV. The biggest problem - and pretty much THE REASON I don´t go for StuGs - is the fact that it´s dead with three shots. This often means instantly. Increase its health and I might consider building StuGs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzergrenadiers with schrecks and general stuff3 Nov 2014, 10:33 AM Schrecks are weaker than ever, since the penultimate patch. That greatly decreased their accuracy on range. The latest patch decreased the dps and veterancy-accumulation of Paks. Ostheer AT has never been weaker. Suddenly Schrecks need to be decreased in performance (again). I disagree. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Russian Double Sniper + Guards2 Nov 2014, 14:59 PM The reinforcement cost could go up to at least 120mp, so you would need to take care of them. Right now they are a no brainer. The dps advantage the German sniper has, is pretty much there to keep it in business versus mainly 5-6 men weapon crews/ squads. What remains is the better surviabilty of the Russian sniper, making it the better unit. In: COH2 Balance