Profile of Ful4n0

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 345

General Information


Thread: December 10Th Hotfix11 Dec 2015, 08:25 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2015, 00:14 AMTaurusBully Pershing is an inf killing machine, unlike the panther. Pz4 behave excellent againts inf, unlike the Ez8 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW free AA 9 Dec 2015, 14:17 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 13:30 PMJohnnyB Riflemen instead of volks anyone? We can continue for ever, but this was not the point. yeahhh in the actual state of OKW???, why not???? I would give rifleman if USF gets free shrecks, free healing, free repairs free AA, and in top of that, better tanks, cheap teching, capabilitiy of build trucks both in the safety of your onw base or in the middle of the battlefield if you think you can profit in that position, and go on... and yeah, that is not the point, point is that you are defending something that is a pure no sense.... in the past OKW had some benefits coz they had really a great disvantage: fuel and munitions penalties. Now disvantage is gone, but you want to keep the benefits hahhahaha. More than that, if I remember properly you have state this in the past, I mean, that free AA, free repairs and free healing and no side tech for srecks was fair coz income penalties. and now, that penalties are gone, you try to defend that they must remain free??? no-sense. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: A move > ambushed Goliath9 Dec 2015, 12:58 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 12:03 PMBlackart https://youtu.be/cxEDLHGUcO8?t=1m30s We need this now!: I read sometime ago that those anti tank dogs were a total failure....they were trained with SU tanks (gasoline) so when they were deployed to the battlefield they don´t search for axis tanks (diesel) but run behide SU tanks coz they were used to the diesel smell In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is completely out of control9 Dec 2015, 12:54 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 07:45 AMIA3 - HH kubel should get MG removed, shrecks should go to strumpios ??!!!! L2P my friend if you want move schreck from volks to strumpios, i want bazooka only for rear echelon i agree with removing mg for kubel, give HMG instead kubel mg ok, bazzoka only for RE, then no need to side tech to get zooks for RE and bars for riflemen, and of course, no need to go back to the rack to pick the weapon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW free AA 9 Dec 2015, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 12:26 PMJohnnyB Why don't you take that "AT gun" and give me the old pak 40 or ZIS or 57 mm or whatever instead? better than that, take zooks instead of shreck, take RE instead of spio, and take sherman m4 instead of pz4. u mad? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: RIP Rear Echelon :'C4 Dec 2015, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2015, 08:21 AMEsxile Changed it because of Rifle company. 160mp unit with CP0 flamthrowers, would be completely broken. just asking but, wouldn´t be better then if they set that first ability in rifle company as a call-in "RE with flamethrower, with adjusted stats, and then, leave the normal RE´s as always??? RE don´t get Flamethrower non-doctrinal because the are dirty cheap if I´m not wrong, but now, you get more expensive RE because there is one doctrine where they could be OP. It doesn´t make sense to me....is just a plain nerf to RE´s except when using rifle company, where they can enjoy their flamethrowers....not only a nerf (well deserved) to the doctrine, but a nerf to this RE unit itself in any other commander. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Sherman 76mm gun upgrade?3 Dec 2015, 15:41 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 13:40 PMAustralian Magic But Volks don't need AI upgrade to fight only in late-game because they struggle even in early and mid game, while Sherman is perfectly fine when it hits the field and even in late game it has quite nice chance to penetrate tanks well, in early game you have spios too. OKW don´t have a mainline infantery that can win 1v1 engagements with allies mainline infantery in the same way that allies engies can´t beat 1v1 sturmpios....so not sure about that, but hey, thanks for such a good response man, much appreciated. Again my knolegde of game mechanism and stats is not enough to talk properly about balance, just here to learn from others and to improve my performance with this game. gonna let the thread continue now.....this is not a volks vs sherman thread hehehe. Thanks australian! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Sherman 76mm gun upgrade?3 Dec 2015, 12:52 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 12:29 PMAustralian Magic Not quite. Volks are useless as a AI unit. Sherman is not useless as AT unit haha, ok ok, thanks for your reply, I think I have learnt some new things with your kindly answers man. Much appreciated. I cannot agree with your last one.....imho if volks need AI help to figth late game inf, shermans need help to fight late game Armor. but I have no skills to talk so much about balance.... Thanks for your replies man, really, no joke. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Sherman 76mm gun upgrade?3 Dec 2015, 12:19 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 11:58 AMAustralian Magic Just like Pz4 is not the best tool agasint IS2, T34/85 or E8 That's why Axis have JPIV or PzV while Allies have M36 or SU85. Can´t say you are wrong....seems fair. so volks don´t deserve any AI upgrade as lot of people here wants because you have others AI tools? just asking. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Sherman 76mm gun upgrade?3 Dec 2015, 11:49 AM I suppose those who want that upgrade to 76mm want to get a better scalability for the sermhan m4, which once heavies start rolling into the field, sherman lose tons of utility coz a sherman can figth a p4 but is not a great tool againts a KT for example. I think that´s the reason, not saying OP is right or wrong.... In: COH2 Gameplay