Profile of blancat

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 810

General Information


Thread: Commander KV1 and Easy8 rework idea's20 Mar 2019, 08:56 AM Ez8 need more commander dont need be "commander tank" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander Info: Creator Proposals and Discussion19 Mar 2019, 06:22 AM Ez8 and Pershing have only one commander The newly adopted "urban assault company" seems boring and worse than infantry company How about make new one likes Soviet armored assault tactics? USF Armored assault company concept : massive heavy armors and air support 0cp) assault engineer 0cp) Ez 8 4cp) air supply drop zone 12cp) P47 rocket strike 13cp) Pershing In: Lobby
Thread: Are soviets popular or too weak so nobody plays them? 17 Mar 2019, 08:54 AM current most strongest 2 factions are OKW and Soviet In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: about axis new commander17 Mar 2019, 08:47 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2019, 22:15 PMIncendiaryRounds Why didn't u call out your fellow allied fanboy. Put him in check. He's spewing hot shit like only teh USF mortar was nerfed and the axis one wasn't?! Eveyone knows the Ost mortar was nerfed too. And sector assault was already fixed and the shooting outside circle thing was proven to be a myth. He is saying about axis vanilla heavy tanks and allies TD not mortars, sector assault Your criticism is not appropriate In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on Panzergrenadiers17 Mar 2019, 08:19 AM decrease pop cap(9 -> 8) and reinforce cost (34->32) Thats enough He is enough strong In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Commander Info: Creator Proposals and Discussion17 Mar 2019, 08:08 AM tiger ace should be revamped but i dont want to 2 diffrent version of Tiger in new axis commanders I think King Tiger should be included in the new Weh commander In: Lobby
Thread: New Commander Info: Creator Proposals and Discussion15 Mar 2019, 16:15 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2019, 15:43 PMAarotron there is diffirence in inspiring new unit form historical roots and in trying to make game realistic. Ariborne engineers as idea was former make game realistic is not important It is important what role it plays in the game and how practical it is it is not Man of war What can an engineer who infiltrates the rear? nothing make them more strong with 3 DP or something? That is not engineer I don't understand why the engineers have to infiltrate the rear from air It was necessary in history, but not in the game And the airborn engineer is a very minor part In: Lobby
Thread: New Commander Info: Creator Proposals and Discussion15 Mar 2019, 11:22 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2019, 11:19 AMCrecer13 I think that one of the main roles of the Paratroopers should be the destruction of howitzers. Each ordinary paratrooper had 400 grams of explosives. Give the Paratroopers a explosives charge like a penal. not bad idea i hope USF airborne get some handy explosives charge Timed Explosive Charge have no practical effect In: Lobby
Thread: New Commander Info: Creator Proposals and Discussion15 Mar 2019, 11:06 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2019, 11:00 AMFarlon They could do many different things. You could turn them into infiltration sturmpioneers, make them start with Mosins and give them the option to upgrade flamers, ppsh or anything else. Give them reinforced barbed wire, mine similar to teller mines, basic soviet mine, cover removing demo, maybe small sandbags. And give them the sniper model for the lulz. Wow, that looks like a unit that can do many things What about the ability to make stun the tank while in camo? build mines, do AT, do AI.....sniper model? looks cool What a wonderful "Captain Soviet Enginner airborne blablabla guard" In: Lobby
Thread: New Commander Info: Creator Proposals and Discussion15 Mar 2019, 10:47 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2019, 05:17 AMSmartie Para units always had special engineer companies. If you look back at the conquest of the belgium fort Eben Emael then you would see that this fortress was captured by german falschirmjägerpioniers. To think that Para are only fulfiling the role of an "infiltration unit" is a bit one dimensional. I just wanted to show that there are other options than to make a copy and paste soviet para unit. But its ok if you dont like it. coh2 is a game that is far from historical fact Although Wirbelwind was much more productive, it did not appear in the game.(instead only ostwind appear in coh2) The U.S. Army Air Force has done a great job, but most of the USF CAS in coh2 is poor(Poor accuracy and low damage rocket make player feel disappointed, and no one uses strafing run) No common air bombardment skill, rather inferior to luftwaffe I hoped to include historic aviation support skills in the new USF commander, but strumpanther created a bizarre mix-up boring commander urban assault? Why does that matter? he missed the most important thing anyway back to topic, For the Soviets who don't have a proper infiltration unit, the Airborne Guard is a not bad idea But you have to think, "How" to differentiate from existing units 1) 6 man durable mainline infantry = USF airborne 2) a small number but elite infantry for special purpose = UKF commando, Weh stormtrooper 1&2 Mixed = falschirmjäger 3) just OP unit from vague thinking of "elite" = JLI Don't make it 3) ex) 3 dp 6 man infantry want to make engineer airborne? ok but you have to think about what role it would play if it appeared in the game infiltrate for rear disturbance? how? placing mine or demo in camo? Is it really practical in the game? I want you to find the right and creative answer - used google translater In: Lobby