Profile of blancat

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 810

General Information


Thread: Soviet Infantry Design29 May 2019, 12:40 PM Guard should be nerfed at least they should be able to use only one of the two weapon(DP, PTRS) Using both weapons at once is too OP It is better to give Soviet users a choice than to remove PTRS from the guard rifle In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some change for Consript28 May 2019, 20:00 PM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2019, 18:43 PMCrecer13 ou are talking nonsense, conscripts are not "fine". Rifleman are better and very flexible than Penals and Concripts. watch recent 1vs1 USF top player games they dont use rifleman so much(using 1 or 2 and use mainly call-in infantry and 50cal) except playing infantry company&heavy cavalry their cost efficiency is terrible because thier far-mid accuracy is fucking awful and have low dmg(8) BAR rifle is strong but always drop weapons without M1919, rifle is just burden expensive infantry In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some change for Consript28 May 2019, 19:47 PM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2019, 19:19 PMMr Carmine Lol what game are you playing? Cons more efficient then rifles haha. Top players mostly avoid cons. Just like most other players. Cons are far from being meta for obvious reasons. Cons will most likely get well deserved buffs for their support abilities from the commander patch. Their support currently does not scale wich is weird considering it should be their defining feuture. So my claim is probably correct. Even devs and mod team sees they are quite inefficent and dont scale where the need to. beacause cons is not combat infantry guards do anything and cons is just capping, meatshield infantry They do their job well now u want combat unit, then spam fucking guards ^^ i agree cons buff if guards get some nerf and delete their own support skill and price nerf In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some change for Consript28 May 2019, 17:39 PM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2019, 16:32 PMMr Carmine Where did i say buff/change them to be on par with volks rifles etc? People need to stop claiming cons are cheap. Only their reinforce cost is cheap but the high rec acc counteracts that, Their price is not cheap, their tech is not cheap. And in what world does removing oorah and merge and adding 1 of the worst lmg,s in t4 warrant a prince increase to 260 mp? They still would have short range at nade, wich is weaker without oorah. Lolotov is still pretty bad. And nerf gaurds on top of that. Its a double nerf actualy. The new patch will give merge more use, their sandbags more use. You know their supporting abilities are actualy scaling. so stop claiming buff cons cons is support/anvil unit all top soviet player dont blame about cons because they are "fine" At least they are more efficient than shitty expensive rifleman In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some change for Consript28 May 2019, 09:26 AM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2019, 19:50 PMMr Carmine To be at their best cons require a lot more then just 240mp. There actualy more expensive then grens and volks all costs conciderd. And both can snare and have better nade and non doc ai upgrade. And no oorah and merge dont come close to that in terms of scaling or ussefulnes. Cons fail at both hammer and anvil. Only doctrines can make them either. But that is bad design at its finest. Cons are avoided bey most players because of how cost ineffective they are. Cons are not worth it. The cant hold the line. They cant push the line. They are suppporting the worst mg and mortar. The worst engi if they dont get flamer. They make stronger units weaker with merge, as a result they save very little mp in the long run. That is taking the entire faction into consideration. Cons should be the backbone support wise but fall short in that regard quite handely. u want buff cons? fine delete merge and ura increase price to 260/25 delete received accuarcy penalty and unlock 1 DP28 in final tier nerf guards(5 man, only use PTRS or DP28 not the same time) worth it? You want to eliminate the faction's personality and like all the faction to be the same? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some change for Consript28 May 2019, 09:21 AM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2019, 20:21 PMKatitof I exist in a world where units in question are constantly swinging from OP to UP with literally nothing in between. This is funny, because osttruppen got reliable DPS and got weapon upgrade with time. yep, osttruppen got lmg42 upgrade but still "osttruppen" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht problems. 27 May 2019, 19:24 PM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2019, 19:00 PMIncendiaryRounds https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198008173898 Your playercard is largely unranked. Now I understand why u don't post it. So lets play 1vs1 with me Are u scared? Prove yourself Do not run away In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht problems. 27 May 2019, 18:51 PM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2019, 18:47 PMIncendiaryRounds Ost p4 has literally the same AI as a cromwell, with the pintle upgrade making it slightly better. Bar rifles blobs easily beat lmg gren blobs. Just don't stop at max range. Get into midrange even if you take one or two casualties. You'll win at the end. You're also salty that the Persh is not a Tiger. U called it a mEdIuM tAnK, lol. Don't talk to me again, cuz you don't know anything and u don't have a playercard (for good reason probably) I said, USE MG42 get into a mid range, grens are more strong because they have rifle grenade Pershing have very low HP and can counterble easily by Panther Don't talk to me again, cuz you don't know anything and u don't have a playercard -> want 1vs1? i will play weh and u play USF https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198008173898/ add me and go 1v1 with me, coward dont know anything is u how pity In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht problems. 27 May 2019, 18:33 PM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2019, 18:31 PMIncendiaryRounds I'm giving u a chance to redeem yourself. Are u sure u stand behind this ignorance? Ost needs an Ostwind to deal with blobs since by the midgame mgs are very threatened by almost all units. And the fact that even in the early game, they are entirely counterable. All the other factions can just make their own blob to counter a blob but gren blobs are the least efficient due to low squad sizes. deal with blobs? USE Pz4 and MG42 Why does ostwind have to deal with blobing? It can be pz4 without ostwind You do not understand why ostwind is not used And the fact that even in the early game, they are entirely counterable -> Mg42 is not super power squad that is just skill problem not unit if u cant keep mg42 and dislike 4-squad unit, just play other faction and lmg42 grens blob is very powerful blobing in this game At least a stupid and expensive BAR rifle blobing cant deal with lmg42 grens blobing In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht problems. 27 May 2019, 18:28 PM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2019, 18:20 PMIncendiaryRounds They buffed AoE distance. But the end result is that ostwind is still UP and nobody uses it. Ever heard of result-oriented? Nobody wants to hear the "theoretical" buffs, we wanna see how much faster the ostwind can kill a squad, in other words, TANGIBLE improvement. The reason Ostwind is not used is because he have less AT ability than Pz4 Can you deal with the enemy's medium tanks with ostwind? No matter how much Ostbud gets buffs, people will use Pz4 Pz4 is much better and easy to use And I don't know why you're obsessed with the oostwind Ostwind problem is not important to Wehmacht In: COH2 Gameplay