Dear god you're insufferable.
IR in this context is a shorthand way of referring to IncendiaryRounds, the other person in this ongoing tooth pulling of a discussion. The slightest amount of competence would have made that self evident.
Don't get so smug about your own lack of reading comprehension, it's embarrasing
And again the problem is you insane need to put excuses to anything but what you want to talk, any point i proved you wrong is ommited, and now even those you bring yourself now are indeed flawed.
I would suggest you to read for once and learn to shut your mouth for ever.
All of which is little impact on the fundementals:
A) The MG42 imo is in a good spot
B) Every other MG falls short of the MG42
C) Either the others need to be made more cost effective or the MG42 needs to bump in price
D) Grenadiers are not a reason to not implement this change
And yet you understand nothing about the game mechanics and your opinions fall short on the words of other people that do know the game. You are not even suggesting or raising a new idea, you are just a speaker of the same BS every L2P alliefanboi says.
"C) Either the others need to be made more cost effective or the MG42 needs to bump in price"
Killed your last neuron, and the next one:
"D) Grenadiers are not a reason to not implement this change"
Shows you never played OST.
The faction has to be balance within itself and with others. So both arguments are wrong.
EDIT: What people nowdays say "Its a bad design" means the faction isnt balanced in itslef, and when ppl rant about "(Instert faction) is OP/UP" its the inbetween factions balance. Gosh i need to explain to this level