Satchel cost 60, and its locked behind an specialist unit, thats why its better than gammon bomb
Gammon is T4 and its locked behind a specialization, thats why its worse than satchel? There is always a counterargument
Posts: 919
Satchel cost 60, and its locked behind an specialist unit, thats why its better than gammon bomb
Posts: 677
Posts: 297
its still not on a specialized unit, but in the main infantry, an specialized unit should always be better at his job than the all around ones
Gammon is T4 and its locked behind a specialization, thats why its worse than satchel? There is always a counterargument
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Once more comparing Gammon and satchel is quite pointless.
Different design intent and different timing.
Satchel is an AI/anti-garrison/anti-fortification/anti-structure device that can be used against vehicles.
Gammon is anti-vehicle device that can be used for AI/anti-garrison/anti-fortification purposes.
Posts: 677
...
In order to find a more appropriate price, we need to compare it to something else which is already in the game.
We have already established that the gammon bomb is strictly inferior in terms of anti-garrison/anti-infantry to the satchel charge.
...
When it comes to AT performance, we have the following abilities to compare it with:
Posts: 1930
Gammon is dodge-able never argued differently and that is why I described it as a gamble in it current form...
I only argued that if it to become cheaper and more spammable it should also become weaker. Less investment less rewards...
That would make UKF blobs more dangerous vs vehicles. Imagine a slow vehicle or a vehicle with engine damage making a ideal target for 3 tommies squad that can stun lock it with gammon bomb and destroy it with Piats regardless of it armor due to gammon high penetration and Piat deflection damage.
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
98 | |||||
28 | |||||
1 | |||||
63 | |||||
53 | |||||
11 | |||||
7 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |