Posts: 17887 | Subs: 8
222 whine started before the patch and look nobody whining about it
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 526
L2P please, land mattress damage is fine
Posts: 526
Just tested this, total bullshit, took 4 barrages in total which is 4 minutes in total if you have 1.
Posts: 1072
PanzerGeneralForever you donut sound salty at all
L2P please, land mattress damage is fine
Posts: 959
Can't wait to see the whine about new 222 against Brits. Of course the natural reply will be "L2P"
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
222 whine started before the patch and look nobody whining about it, more against brits. Which is understandable.
Emplacement spam with land mattress, yum yum. Will like the next 2 months
1 
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
tbh i don't really feel guilty because ukf already has issues with okw and it's a doctrine exclusive unit, ukf have no rocket artillery otherwise
Posts: 148
Posts: 875 | Subs: 2
invincible Hotchkiss.
Posts: 526
- This might not seem much, but if you fire into the fog of war, the angle is multiplied by 25%
- Thus, to improve horizontal scatter: you need to close the distance AND make sure you have vision on the target
Posts: 824
92 
Posts: 374
Posts: 824
Reasons why i think the landmattress is fine
1: at the moment is because it fires really slowly so it's easy to get out of it's area of effect before having heavy losses. EI: 1 rocket at a time at a slow rate of fire.
2: it's reload speed is fairly low
3: it really isn't all that mobile
4: and the cost is just right.
It may come out really early but when you see an early land mattress you know tanks are going to be delayed by a considerable amount.
Posts: 59
 | Playercard of CTmanGer | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 59
| Playercard of CTmanGer | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1072
Reasons why i think the landmattress is fine
1: at the moment is because it fires really slowly so it's easy to get out of it's area of effect before having heavy losses. EI: 1 rocket at a time at a slow rate of fire.
2: it's reload speed is fairly low
3: it really isn't all that mobile
4: and the cost is just right.
It may come out really early but when you see an early land mattress you know tanks are going to be delayed by a considerable amount.
Posts: 1093
The tank tech is delayed as much as it would getting a Mortar Halftrack --> 40 fuel.
Posts: 247
Posts: 919
Yes indeed. Its a very famous and sad picture of childrens after a napalm strike of the US-airforce.
I have a Black Humor and it fits so nicely since it represents the Situation of brits - axis perfectly for the last Weeks and prob for the next ones too :'D
Posts: 526
 |
|
|
29 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
202 | ||
|
|
|
|
38 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
