Most of us regularly get over 1000% effiency on units. I never got it on any Mg42.
Or in other words: shouldnt they be better? At the moment I rather have a squad thats killing than just stopping things - I rather go one more gren than a mg. Which is kind of booring as I would like to think that the Mg42 is wehrs best squad. It could be that its just my playstyle that doesnt fit the Mg42. So please post if you got it over 1000%.
Wehr is at the moment voted the weakest (or least strong) faction in 1v1. http://www.coh2.org/topic/26662/strongest-1v1-faction-this-patch-october-2014.
Ill add a question, let me know what you think.
+1000club for Mg42/ Is it balanced?
11 Nov 2014, 21:59 PM
#1
Posts: 680
11 Nov 2014, 22:11 PM
#2
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
"Didnt get 1000% efficiency, dont like the unit type, unit must be underpowered, relic pls fix."
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
11 Nov 2014, 22:22 PM
#3
Posts: 818
I think this is more related to the easily availible counters for mgs than their performance.
Both shock troops and Rifles have smoke/nades and Cons have orah and moltovs so their typical targets are more than prepared to deal with them.
Additionally Mgs are more area denial tools than anything since enemies can always just walk a different way, they take extra damage and they must always retreat earlier than other squads and get wiped more easily. These all reduce efficiency just because its an mg.
Edit: To actually comment on the unit, I think it is good to get later on in the game. I've found that against heavy shock and con armys getting 3 grens then 3 mg42s then light vehicles is the best way to fight shocks. You just need a bunch to make them truly effective, not 1 mg for 7 enemy squads but several so you can control a large area. Also Ap rounds are quite cheap and good. Balanced IMO
Both shock troops and Rifles have smoke/nades and Cons have orah and moltovs so their typical targets are more than prepared to deal with them.
Additionally Mgs are more area denial tools than anything since enemies can always just walk a different way, they take extra damage and they must always retreat earlier than other squads and get wiped more easily. These all reduce efficiency just because its an mg.
Edit: To actually comment on the unit, I think it is good to get later on in the game. I've found that against heavy shock and con armys getting 3 grens then 3 mg42s then light vehicles is the best way to fight shocks. You just need a bunch to make them truly effective, not 1 mg for 7 enemy squads but several so you can control a large area. Also Ap rounds are quite cheap and good. Balanced IMO
 | Playercard of -NSO- Hon3ynuts | |||||||||||||||||||
|
11 Nov 2014, 22:28 PM
#4
Posts: 680
"Didnt get 1000% efficiency, dont like the unit type, unit must be underpowered, relic pls fix."
"When playing Ostheer, it can be tricky in the early game"
11 Nov 2014, 22:32 PM
#5
Posts: 467
Additionally Mgs are more area denial tools than anything since enemies can always just walk a different way, they take extra damage and they must always retreat earlier than other squads and get wiped more easily. These all reduce efficiency just because its an mg.
^^
11 Nov 2014, 22:49 PM
#6
Posts: 655
Permanently Banned251 though.
A Fallen Scrub
11 Nov 2014, 23:12 PM
#7
1 Posts: 97
The fancy "efficiency" percentages at the end of a match are awful ways of evaluating how effective a unit is. I mean I never get more than 10% efficiency with vehicle crews, ambulances, and medics so they must be awful right? I doubt it even takes into consideration how much suppression a unit has done (an MG's entire reason to exist).
That poll also tells us nothing about which faction is strongest.
That poll also tells us nothing about which faction is strongest.
11 Nov 2014, 23:15 PM
#8
Posts: 432
The fancy "efficiency" percentages at the end of a match are awful ways of evaluating how effective a unit is. I mean I never get more than 10% efficiency with vehicle crews, ambulances, and medics so they must be awful right? I doubt it even takes into consideration how much suppression a unit has done (an MG's entire reason to exist).
Actually that's just it, it seems efficiency is almost directly evaluated based on casualties and damage inflicted.
11 Nov 2014, 23:24 PM
#9
Posts: 2561
Long story short suppression isn't calculated in efficiency. Veterancy too for that matter, but the unit itself is fine.
11 Nov 2014, 23:24 PM
#10
3 
Posts: 587
Actually that's just it, it seems efficiency is almost directly evaluated based on casualties and damage inflicted.
Yeah, i dont think engineer repairing 200 tanks give any % to the efficiency of it
11 Nov 2014, 23:28 PM
#11
Posts: 158
I think mg42 sucks in the hands of ostheer.
Sooner or later it will be in soviet hands and then its fine
Sooner or later it will be in soviet hands and then its fine
11 Nov 2014, 23:43 PM
#12
Posts: 680
I think mg42 sucks in the hands of ostheer.
Sooner or later it will be in soviet hands and then its fine
At last... someone with experience answers in this thread.
11 Nov 2014, 23:52 PM
#13
Posts: 589
because mgs supress and pin, they don't kill as much as other units , therefore in-game efficiency stat is lower.
12 Nov 2014, 00:00 AM
#14
Posts: 179
MG teams should do more damage in general, but there needs to be a more efficient and cheap means of scouting early game for this to happen. There's a reason a lot of people find this game frustrating that come from other RTS's and wargames - battles continually feel too drawn out and scouting options are few. Sorry I may have been off topic, but those are my thoughts.
12 Nov 2014, 00:01 AM
#15
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
if u want 1000% efficiency use incind rounds on light vehicles to inflate it.
12 Nov 2014, 00:23 AM
#16
Posts: 96
Only thing is that reposition time in buildings...
Are you a Hypocrit?
"blobbing will only get you so far at making you 'better' at the game. you still need to have sound tactical and strategic sense to be succesful at coh and beating other blobbers."
레몬
"blobbing will only get you so far at making you 'better' at the game. you still need to have sound tactical and strategic sense to be succesful at coh and beating other blobbers."
레몬
12 Nov 2014, 01:24 AM
#17
Posts: 219
It wouldn't say neither that it's too strong nor too weak, but it isn't balanced either, the damage output, and suppression, considering the big ark of fire is fine, but it needs a very small increase in surviability, it really dies to everything.
| Playercard of Ace of Swords | |||||||||||||||||||
|
12 Nov 2014, 06:55 AM
#18
Posts: 1740
IMO the MG42 is by far the most balanced heavy MG of the game.
Maxim is just too annoying and the US MG is a bit too weak.
MG34 is a bit too strong as far as I remember.
Maxim is just too annoying and the US MG is a bit too weak.
MG34 is a bit too strong as far as I remember.
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
12 Nov 2014, 12:34 PM
#19
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
"When playing Ostheer, it can be tricky in the early game"
Exactly. Whats your point?
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
12 Nov 2014, 12:46 PM
#20
Posts: 281
Most of us regularly get over 1000% effiency on units. I never got it on any Mg42.
Or in other words: shouldnt they be better? At the moment I rather have a squad thats killing than just stopping things - I rather go one more gren than a mg. Which is kind of booring as I would like to think that the Mg42 is wehrs best squad. It could be that its just my playstyle that doesnt fit the Mg42. So please post if you got it over 1000%.
Wehr is at the moment voted the weakest (or least strong) faction in 1v1. http://www.coh2.org/topic/26662/strongest-1v1-faction-this-patch-october-2014.
Ill add a question, let me know what you think.
your proof that wher is the weakes faction makes no sence, the poll was the best not the worst. ButI according to stats they are one of the weakest.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.28642.872+6
- 3.555227.710+11
- 4.275110.714+13
- 5.249134.650+2
- 6.259143.644+3
- 7.249150.624+10
- 8.19265.747+5
- 9.14138.788+16
- 10.18878.707+2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
734
Board Info
487 users are online:
487 guests
8 posts in the last 24h
48 posts in the last week
149 posts in the last month
48 posts in the last week
149 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44927
Welcome our newest member, ipdellas
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, ipdellas
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM